Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate passes sweeping conservation measure
Reuters ^ | Jan. 15, 2009 | Thomas Ferraro

Posted on 01/15/2009 8:44:34 PM PST by FocusNexus

The Senate on Thursday approved a sweeping conservation measure as it tries to reverse years of rollbacks in environmental protection by the administration of outgoing President George W. Bush.

On a vote of 73-21, it passed a package of nearly 170 land and water bills and sent it to the House of Representatives, which was expected to give it final approval.

Barack Obama is set to sign it into law after he is sworn in as president on Tuesday, one of the first moves in what is likely to be a more aggressive approach toward the environment.

Democratic Sen. Jeff Bingaman of New Mexico called it one of the broadest conservation measures in decades. Mostly Republican critics, however, said it would deny access to lands for possible oil and gas drilling.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhoenvironment; congress; conservation; drillheredrillnow; environment; environmentalists; envirowhackos; greens; obama; oil; oildrilling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
And this is just the beginning...
1 posted on 01/15/2009 8:44:34 PM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Under bill, giant chunks of California stay wild

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/15/MNO215B3BA.DTL

The Senate approved a major expansion of wilderness areas nationwide Thursday, protecting more than 2 million acres of public land from drilling, logging and mining, including 735,000 acres across California.

The 73-to-21 vote was a huge victory for conservationists, who convinced Senate leaders to roll 160 wilderness bills into one giant package. The bill would permanently protect lands in nine states, from the Eastern Sierra Nevada in California to Oregon’s Mount Hood and from Utah’s Zion National Park to the Jefferson National Forest in Virginia.


2 posted on 01/15/2009 8:47:18 PM PST by FocusNexus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

A nation rich in resources refuses to use them....

In the coming century, Chinese historians writing about the fall of America will all ask: “What were they thinking? Were they even thinking at all?”

Then they will laugh. Around the world, we will no longer be despised as “ugly Americans.” We will be ridiculed as “stupid Americans.”


3 posted on 01/15/2009 8:48:27 PM PST by henkster (When I was young I was told anyone could be President. Now I believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

It is a pro terrorism bill because it insures that domestic drilling and mining is limited and more oil is imported from radical middle east states.


4 posted on 01/15/2009 8:49:01 PM PST by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: henkster

You hit the nail right on the head.


5 posted on 01/15/2009 8:53:18 PM PST by Jack Hammer (here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Who were the republican Quislings who voted for this monstrozity?


6 posted on 01/15/2009 8:53:22 PM PST by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
It is a pro terrorism bill

We hunt terrorists, don't we?

7 posted on 01/15/2009 8:53:36 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus; All

Hopefully the folks in the North(NE) enjoy the cost of their

Home Heating Oil!!!

NEXT winter is gunna be tuff on them...


8 posted on 01/15/2009 8:57:20 PM PST by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
The Senate on Thursday approved a sweeping conservation measure as it tries to reverse years of rollbacks in environmental protection by the administration of outgoing President George W. Bush.

What rollbacks? There weren't any.

9 posted on 01/15/2009 9:04:50 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67

its an anti-jobs bill.......imagine a country NOT using its own resources to stay independent and free while providing vast employment opportunities for its own citizens.


10 posted on 01/15/2009 9:10:07 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Postman

I thought all of the current crop (or is it crap) of republicrats were Quislings...


11 posted on 01/15/2009 9:12:14 PM PST by 43north (11.04.08: the day America committed voluntary suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
protecting more than 2 million acres of public land from drilling, logging and mining, including 735,000 acres across California.

Seeing as how wildfires is the one thing that California is in need of increasing.

12 posted on 01/15/2009 9:32:14 PM PST by eclecticEel (In short, I want Obama given the same respect and deference that Democrats have given George Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Barack Obama is set to sign it into law after he is sworn in as president on Tuesday, one of the first moves in what is likely to be a more aggressive approach toward the environment.

It will not be legal...any law the man signs is not legal.

13 posted on 01/15/2009 9:36:52 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Probably blocking drilling in ANWR too. Idiots.


14 posted on 01/15/2009 9:47:05 PM PST by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
And this is just the beginning...

Yes it is, and I've already got near permanent knot in my gut, and a splitting headache.

A little range time would probably help me relax a bit.

15 posted on 01/15/2009 10:09:35 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Wilderness means the federal government is seizing the land and placing off limits to all human access. In states like Idaho, the federal government controls most of the land. That land is unavailable for economic development or generation of a tax base. A nominal "Payment In Lieu of Taxes" is paid on some of the land to offset the tax revenue damage to the states.
16 posted on 01/15/2009 10:20:12 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
A little range time would probably help me relax a bit.

Enjoy it while you can. I'll bet the lefties seize ranges and label them a toxic sites because of the lead.

17 posted on 01/15/2009 10:21:51 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


18 posted on 01/15/2009 10:47:20 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
Enjoy it while you can. I'll bet the lefties seize ranges and label them a toxic sites because of the lead.

Well, then I'll just have to set up some silhouette targets on the side of the hill across the creek, that's about as far I can shoot anyway, and it's all, including the creek, on my mother in law's place. No body around there is going to report gunfire, certainly nothing as tame a 7.62 NATO one round per trigger pull. If I had a belt fed machine gun, that they might report, or maybe not, considering it came from the "gun nut" farm, and the neighbors are used to it. Of course all but one is even farther away. I don't know who lives on that place now, since I think the long time owner has either passed away, or moved "in to town". But if he still lives there.. well he's used to it too, and would often hop on his 4 wheeler and come say hello when he heard us shooting. I know he'd be interested in a belt fed. Probably would want to shoot up a bunch of my ammo with it.

But unfortunately, I don't have a belt fed. :(.

19 posted on 01/15/2009 10:51:03 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
There's a guy in the Pocatello area with a belt fed machine gun mounted "rat patrol" style on his vehicle. I think it shoots 7.62x51 NATO. I've heard him firing at the range. It's pretty noisy. We have a couple FFL's with Class III licenses and a Sheriff who is pretty reasonable. One FFL has a nice M14 and M16 available for sale, but well out of my price range. I just dropped over $12K on a new 2007 Yamaha Roadliner. The two rifles are more expensive than the bike and much less useful to me.
20 posted on 01/15/2009 11:25:45 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson