Skip to comments.
Specter draws blood from Holder
Politico ^
| January 15, 2009
Posted on 01/16/2009 9:25:52 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: FormerACLUmember
Holder will be obviously the most corrupt, totalitarian Attorney General in American history.Oh, no no no...Surely you know that title is reserved for the eeeeevil John Ashcroft, who hated black people and wanted to wiretap billions of innocent Americans so he could force his religious beliefs on them. Plus, he was Hitler...AND Satan...Both...
21
posted on
01/16/2009 10:25:07 AM PST
by
opus86
To: rightwingintelligentsia
Holder has long viewed the AG spot as "his." His PRECIOUSSsss. You'd better not threaten to take away his Precious. When you do, the meek, gentlemanly face gives way ...
22
posted on
01/16/2009 10:28:57 AM PST
by
pogo101
To: Carley
23
posted on
01/16/2009 10:29:47 AM PST
by
devistate one four
(Impatiently waiting for the next tea party! Tet '68)
To: y6162
Gee... Specter acting like a Republican senator? What next?
Sadly enough, he'll get over it.
24
posted on
01/16/2009 10:39:40 AM PST
by
RobinOfKingston
(Democrats, the party of evil. Republicans, the party of stupid.)
To: rightwingintelligentsia
"You're getting close to the line. You're getting close to questioning my integrity," Holder said. "That is not appropriate. That is not fair."What integrity?
25
posted on
01/16/2009 10:39:50 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(One shot revolution.)
To: Renkluaf
just imagine what Holder, the MSM, or any Dem for that matter, would say if either Justices Roberts or Alito had stated (with every right to do so in their case) during their confirmation hearings ... "You're getting close to the line. You're getting close to questioning my integrity."
To: KansasGirl
”You’re getting close to the line. You’re getting close to questioning my integrity,” Holder said. “That is not appropriate. That is not fair.”
Not fair? You've got to be kidding.
To: KansasGirl
You’re getting close to questioning my integrity,” Holder said. “That is not appropriate. That is not fair.” Silly me. I always thought that the purpose of the Senate's 'Advice and Consent' role in appointments was precisely to 'question' the qualifications, temperament and integrity of nominees.
28
posted on
01/16/2009 10:51:36 AM PST
by
Ditto
To: Ditto
Liberals, when pressed, resort to statements of selective indignation..
29
posted on
01/16/2009 11:13:02 AM PST
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: Arizona Carolyn
He is up for re-election in 2010... Damn, AC, you beat me to it!
A shame, isn't it, that when a politician half does something right, the first instinct is to see when he/she is up for reelection...
I hold no brief for the nominee, but I wonder what would have happened if Holder claimed Scottish law as his reasoning...considering Spectacle's recent support for it...
30
posted on
01/16/2009 7:31:15 PM PST
by
Christian4Bush
(Role of the press: Republican scandal - prosecutors; Democrat scandal - Defense attorneys.)
To: Christian4Bush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson