Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Faster Wireless Broadband delayed if DTV's delayed
tgdaily ^ | Friday, January 16, 2009 13:41 | Samantha Rose Hunt

Posted on 01/16/2009 5:29:52 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

Chicago (IL) - The transition to digital television (DTV) has taken long enough in the opinions of many, and if the deadline is pushed back any further it will mean that faster wireless broadband will also be delayed. But why?

On February 17th, 2009, analog broadcast television stations will be forced to transfer all of their programming to digital channels as part of a process which reclaims the valuable frequencies in the 700MHz band for subsequent delivery to mobile broadband providers.

The Federal government has made many attempts to prepare consumers for the switch, and currently the Obama administration is recommending yet another extension.

The transition began on Thursday as Hawaiian television stations were set to go all digital on an early deadline. Hawaii was responsible for making the change early to make a smooth transition from one antenna site to another on the Big Island. The television stations are relocating their towers away from the slopes of the Halekala volcano prior to the nesting season of an endangered bird - the dark-rumped petrel.

The transition in Hawaii has gone well thus far, though the reactions of consumers have yet to be made public.

Verizon Wireless and AT&T both have plans to utilize the new 700MHz spectrum for the next best thing in mobile broadband - which is based on Long Term Evolution technology. Verizon is nervous that a delay in the switch to digital television could mean a delay in the release of the Verizon Wireless LTE network which should rollout this year.

AT&T and Verizon have both voiced their concerns about the delay to lawmakers pointing out that both companies paid billions of dollars in an auction for the 700MHz spectrum license.

Verizon desperately wants to roll out the LTE network because they can’t really do much more with their current 3G network, which is based on EV-DO (Evolution-Data Optimized) technology, and it just isn’t fast enough to meet consumer's demand.

With their goal being better business, Verizon has every reason to oppose an extension in the deadline for the digital switch as a delay could hold back testing and deployment of new income streams for the company.

Deploying a new technology is challenging enough without having further delays.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atsc

1 posted on 01/16/2009 5:29:52 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

“which reclaims the valuable frequencies in the 700MHz band”

Wow, I never heard of a 700 MHz band, but I’m only an EE.

Guess they invented that after I left college. We have morons reporting the news. You can tell them anything and they just write it down and think it’s gospel.


2 posted on 01/16/2009 5:39:42 PM PST by Eagles2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

“which reclaims the valuable frequencies in the 700MHz band”

Wow, I never heard of a 700 MHz band, but I’m only an EE.

Guess they invented that after I left college. We have morons reporting the news. You can tell them anything and they just write it down and think it’s gospel.


3 posted on 01/16/2009 5:40:10 PM PST by Eagles2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Sorry for the double post, this time it was my fault.

The ones a few months back happened to a bunch of us, it was a
SW problem.


4 posted on 01/16/2009 5:42:01 PM PST by Eagles2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

First of all...there is no Obama Administration...yet


5 posted on 01/16/2009 5:42:24 PM PST by CIDKauf (No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I’m not so sure the double post was my fault, the FR SW seems to be looping again. Like I said, FR has had this problem before.


6 posted on 01/16/2009 5:50:16 PM PST by Eagles2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Obama is pandering to his non tax paying base while royally screwing both the broadcasters and the people who paid billions for access to the spectrum. It's a disservice to everyone to pander over a luxury. Typical leftist schmuck.
7 posted on 01/16/2009 5:50:59 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles2003

Welcome to the club. Never heard of a “700 Mhz band” either.

FWIW, here’s what I’ve heard about this “LTE” horsecrap:

The 700Mc spectrum was auctioned off under the moniker “Auction 73” to bidders, of which Verizon was one.

There are a couple of chunks of the spectrum that are contiguous 22-Mc wide clear spans. The “LTE” plan holds forth with the theoretical bandwidths of 100MB/sec down, 50MB/sec up, with coverage over most urban areas.

As a somewhat jaded EE having seen some of this stuff talked up much larger than the talkers’ wallets, let me just say this about that:

I’ll believe it when I see it.


8 posted on 01/16/2009 5:54:34 PM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CIDKauf

Yet, despite its current non-existence it has managed to become the most corrupt regime in American history.


9 posted on 01/16/2009 5:54:43 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eagles2003

Good Point. The state of reporting is sad indeed. Like why is this included in the story and not other salient information.

The television stations are relocating their towers away from the slopes of the Halekala volcano prior to the nesting season of an endangered bird - the dark-rumped petrel


10 posted on 01/16/2009 5:55:24 PM PST by downwdims (The Borrower is Slave to the Lender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
That slice of the TV spectrum only involves channels 52 through 83 and some of those channels no longer exist anyway.

The remainder of those channels are sparsely populated.

Check your local listings and see how many channels you can receive above channel 51 as they are the only ones desired for mobile broadband.

11 posted on 01/16/2009 6:23:25 PM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
For a good over-view of this, go to this URL (It's large and takes a few sec. to load)

http://www.tvtower.com/Commercial%20Television%20Frequencies.html#tv

Lots of interesting data and graphics, and it explains a lot.

12 posted on 01/16/2009 6:28:32 PM PST by capt. norm (Never underestimate the power of very stupid people in large groups.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
Check your local listings and see how many channels you can receive above channel 51 as they are the only ones desired for mobile broadband.

Bzzt. Though the magic of virtual channels, the actual channel number for the digital channel is hidden. For example, in the Lansing market

6 = 59

10 = 57

18 = 34

23 = 55

47 = 38

53 = 51

To a guide it might look like there is only one channel in the 52 though 69, but actually there are 4 using those frequencies (one analog, three digital). Under current law, stations in 52 - 69 need to leave the frequencies after 2/17/09

13 posted on 01/16/2009 8:56:21 PM PST by garyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson