Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toddsterpatriot; lonestar67
He was trying to be friends with everybody, so he refused to veto bloated budgets.

I always thought the "new tone in Washington" was a slick of saying a "bipartisan raid on the Treasury." Kind of how "comprehensive immigration reform" is a slick way of saying "amnesty."

I remember how W's early State of the Union addresses were really laundry lists of new programs and how much he was spending on them. Perhaps I should dig out one of them for the last of W's spending defenders. Even the most serious Bush-bots concede the spending issue.

87 posted on 01/18/2009 7:32:46 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

Bush did hold the line on spending for red headed, left handed, dyslexic, special education, early childhood learning programs.


88 posted on 01/18/2009 7:42:57 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (This is morning, that's when I spend the most time, thinking 'bout what I've given up...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson