[utahson]

Actually the ones really imploding are the ones that are completely biased and only spout one side, the liberal side. They turn off half of the public, thus losing any potential sales from them, plus the losses to the internet. The only way to survive as a newspaper is to report fairly all sides and just not the liberal bias. The Wall Street Journal will always survive because it is more fair and balanced than the Times or any liberal newspaper in the country.

[UCFRoadWarrior]

I dont find the Wall Street Journal any better than the NYT...the WSJ mostly is a liberal paper....with extreme anti-American views on illegal aliens and Globalism (much like the NYT)

[MadPenguin]

Actually the ones really imploding are the ones that are completely biased and only spout one side, the liberal side.

And the few either (mostly) unbiased or the right-leaning papers in this country, are they fairing any better? I would hope they would be doing better, just to shove it in the face of the liberal media!

The day after the election, I canceled my subscription to the Raleigh Snooze and Disturber. When they asked for a reason, I told them I would no longer support their biased reporting of the "news". Since then, they've made repeated attempts to regain my business. Each time I tell them the same thing. They just refuse to get it!