Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What are the fundamentals of the crude oil market?
Tulsa World ^ | 1/18/2009 | JOHN STANCAVAGE

Posted on 01/18/2009 11:05:53 AM PST by kellynla

When oil rocketed past $100 on its way to $147 a barrel last summer, analysts frequently commented that prices "were not supported by the fundamentals."

Now, with oil trading between $35 and $50 in recent weeks, a few questions keep crossing my mind.

Do the current "fundamentals" support $40 oil?

What price do the "fundamentals" support?

In 2009, with the world a different place after an economic meltdown, just what the heck are the modern "fundamentals" of the energy market?

I called John Olson, the co-manager of Houston Energy Partners, for some answers.

Olson told me that the fundamentals of pricing haven't changed. They remain supply and demand, with additional forces provided by Mother Nature, demographics, and global politics and related tensions.

"We're going through a down cycle right now," he said. "Things will sort themselves out in the next few months or quarters."

One thing is clear: Huge price swings bring huge problems. That's when fundamentals fly out the window, replaced by optimism and greed, or pessimism and fear.

"No one in the world could afford paying $147 a barrel for oil last July," he said. "And, in a different respect, no one can afford $38 oil now. Oklahoma can't afford it."

Sky-high crude helped bring on the global recession, while cheap oil hurts the energy industry, Olson noted.

While the average consumer may not tear up over oil companies reporting lower profits, those businesses do need to be able to drill the wells that will produce tomorrow's gasoline and other products.

'Drilling already is being cut back," Olson said. "The situation is that we produce about 86 million barrels a day, but the rate of decline now is about 6 percent. So, that's five million barrels a day we need to replace."

Every year, that decline curve will get steeper, he predicted. And, it will be more costly to reach the newer reserves.

Along with supply issues, a glance at the other fundamentals indicates that sub-$40 oil may not be around too long.

Mother Nature, Olson said, will affect supplies at some point. The global population still is growing. China and other countries continue to add large amounts of infrastructure. And, the recession will end eventually.

"Also, the world remains a dangerous place," Olson said, noting that an incident could restrict output from large producers.

Oil futures traders seem to recognize these fundamentals, he pointed out. Oil on long-term contracts ranges from $63 a barrel for the full-year 2009 to $74 in 2013. Some analysts even have predicted a return to $80 to $90 oil by 2011.

Speculators already are beginning to circle like sharks. In fact, they are out in the water right now, swimming around huge tankers they've leased and filled with cheap crude, waiting for prices to rebound.

"Circumstances have created some of the strangest spending cycles ever," Olson said. "The market is going to be sloppy and messy for a while."

Just watch out for those fins.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: crude; energy; futures; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: IronJack

I recieve oil money and so do a lot of folks like me ...Strangely Big Oil is comprised of a whole lot of little people.You have bought into something that does not exist


21 posted on 01/18/2009 12:56:17 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

You said — “I believe he’s referring to people in the oil business...”

Yeah, I’m sure that’s what was being referred to. But, my interests may not be their interests... :-)

And then you said — “thackney” is a lot more knowledgeable than I on this subject but I believe the break even point for American oil production these days is about $40/barrel.

I think I’ve been reading that it might have to go down to $20 a barrel before it “finds the bottom” and then works back up again.


22 posted on 01/18/2009 12:57:11 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
"the break even point for American oil production these days is about $40/barrel"

I'd guess that the BE point for producers is all over the place. The question of interest to me is what is the price point for domestic producers to grow domestic output at, say 10%, per year?

Would it then be cheaper to invade Mexico or Venezuela to get off Arab Oil.?

23 posted on 01/18/2009 12:57:44 PM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
"If oil companies were allowed to drill"

Indeed.

And it's not just oil. The last refinery was built in this country 30 years ago.

They've been trying to build one in Yuma for about a dozen years but think about it, 30 freaking years. It amazes me supply hasn't been a problem. 30 years!

So when there's a cold snap and a big increase in heating oil demand and the price of gas goes up people are surprised?

Sigh, I guess that won't happen once the government takes over that market and sends all the capitalists to reeducation camps.

24 posted on 01/18/2009 1:10:11 PM PST by Proud_texan (Scare people enough and they'll do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BobL
My plan is to buy a bunch of shares of USO, which is an ETF available just like a stock that tracks the present price of crude.

"Buying Oil"

25 posted on 01/18/2009 1:10:52 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Looks like it would be best to buy an oil well.


26 posted on 01/18/2009 1:19:08 PM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

“This brief respite from oil tyranny should be the impetus we need to uncover any sources of energy we can that are not dependent on crude. I don’t care if it means burning corn cobs and lawn clippings. We should never again rest our economy or our national security on the whims of amoral oil giants who have reached the point where they are economic superpowers in their own right.”

What the heck are you talking about. Except for those that are part of a cartel, oil giants have very little power. They are the playthings of governments and the market.


27 posted on 01/18/2009 1:20:51 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer

Interesting...I’ve been to a bunch of web sites regarding USO and none of them have noted what’s stated here...rather they stated that the ETFs simply track the current price, but, yes, they do trade futures. So I’m not sure...but I’m going in anyway.


28 posted on 01/18/2009 1:37:04 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler; All

“Oklahoma can’t afford it.” I having been spending a fair bit of time at Market Watch, reading oil related articles. Here are some facts and opinions that I have encountered:

1) Cushing, OK, a major oil depot has nearly filled its capacity. A lot of oil is being stored on oil tankers, and the world appears to be running out of storage space. Everyone is waiting for oil/gasoline sales to move back up so they can sell at a higher price than now. The contracts for “futures” in the next few months are higher than the futures for next month. This is called “contango”, not to be confused with the Argentinian dance of a similar name.

2) A lot of sentiment there was expressed regarding not resuming big spending on gasoline. I decided to take a straw poll of people planning to continue to conserve, and those planning to return to “the good old days”. The vote was 35 conserve, 8 use more. I wonder if that would match the FR sentiment.

3) While OPEC may holler about cutting back, they can’t just turn off the wells, as it is too expensive to get them started again. There or at FR it was mentioned that both Russian and Iran may have a stake in encouraging the Gaza war to increase the price of oil, so they probably won’t intervene effectively to stop it.

4) Sentiment is mixed as to whether oil will drop into the 20’s, vs. moving up to the 60’s and 70’s. Sentiment is pretty strong that it was the speculators that drove the price up into the 100+ area, and this is not likely to happen again in the near future (until amnesia sets in again, my comment).


29 posted on 01/18/2009 1:56:54 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Proud_texan; All

“It amazes me that suppy has not been a problem.”

Market Watch comments also indicate that refineries are only producing at 82.5% of capacity, because they want to prop up the price of gasoline. It probably would be a good idea to have some more refineries built well away from hurricane and tornado territory, just in case. Another MW topic concerned the Bakken oil production area in our own west. One story said this area has reserves from 200 to 500 billion barrels, more than Saudi Arabia. The only problem is that only 3 or 4 billion are recoverable at current technology and pricing. People who push the high figure are trying to sell hype. Who knows?


30 posted on 01/18/2009 2:05:35 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Yes on #1. I’m just a few miles east of there (in Tulsa). And from the news I’ve read, it’s about ready to overflow... :-)

On #2, I’ve cut way back. I know I’m doing a lot less on gasoline consumption than ever before. Of course, it’s not summer yet... :-)

On #3, I can understand that and it’s most likely true. However, how about slowing down the output on many different wells, instead of shutting them down. Wouldn’t that drastically lower output?

On #4, well, even if gasoline is “up” it seems that oil is “down”. So, we’ll see which one of the two “breaks”...


31 posted on 01/18/2009 2:06:22 PM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Read later.


32 posted on 01/18/2009 2:07:24 PM PST by Joya (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
They are the playthings of governments and the market.

LOL! You must be joking! The Big Five oil companies control gross revenues far greater than most COUNTRIES on this planet. They can buy and sell governments! Not even an economy as powerful as America's is immune to energy manipulations.

There is NO legitimate reason whatsoever that the world's economic health should be held hostage to these godless cartels. Their product is an abomination that should have been obsolete after World War II demonstrated the fragility of the supply line. Instead, we go through these ridiculous cycles of fabricated shortage/fabricated oversupply and we grumble about it but no sooner start to do something and the price drops ... just like it has recently.

Price be damned! Now is the time to drive a final stake into the withered hearts of these economic ghouls by developing ANY and EVERY other source of energy we can: ethanol, biofuels, shale, coal, nuclear, wind, solar, flatulent methane, I don't care. Every day that we depend on oil for our lifeblood, we trade our liberty for ease. This country is made of better stuff.

33 posted on 01/18/2009 2:55:43 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
The Big Five oil companies control gross revenues far greater than most COUNTRIES on this planet.

Who do you consider the the "Big Five"?

34 posted on 01/18/2009 3:04:31 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
Market Watch comments also indicate that refineries are only producing at 82.5% of capacity, because they want to prop up the price of gasoline.

Do you understand that for several months, the stocks of gasoline have been growing in the US? The production and imports continue to be more than the demand.


35 posted on 01/18/2009 3:10:32 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Who do you consider the the "Big Five"?

1. Exxon Mobil
2. Royal Dutch Shell
3. BP
4. Chevron
5. Conoco Phillips

36 posted on 01/18/2009 3:35:17 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

“The Big Five oil companies control gross revenues far greater than most COUNTRIES on this planet”

No, they don’t “control” their revenues. That is, they don’t control future revenues. They have to earn them.

“Price be damned!”

That about sums up your “economic” analysis.


37 posted on 01/18/2009 3:37:17 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

“Their product is an abomination that should have been obsolete after World War II demonstrated the fragility of the supply line”

A war involving hundreds of nations and millions of people probably demonstrates the fragility of the supply lines for plenty of resources.


38 posted on 01/18/2009 3:39:09 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
If you look closely at some of those wonderful charts Thackney posts there are no meaningful fundamentals in the classic sense. One year ago there was suppose to be a 1.5 -1.7 mbpd gap in use vs production. Now it is just the opposite. I think oil based upon currency and availability should be about $55/b. BTW the gasoline market is even more broken.
39 posted on 01/18/2009 3:45:00 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Government only does one thing well - WASTE MONEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
If Exxon Mobil were a country, its 2007 profit would exceed the gross domestic product of nearly two thirds of the 183 nations in the World Bank's economic rankings. That is 2007, before $150-a-barrel crude. And that is Exxon Mobil alone. Add in the others and you've got an economic superpower, a nation without borders, without a government, and with no ethic driving it except greater and greater profit.

Now start factoring in the crude owned and controlled by foreign (and hostile) governments, and it is clear that the oil industry represents an enemy that can very likely accomplish what no other enemy ever did: defeat us.

40 posted on 01/18/2009 3:45:33 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson