Posted on 01/19/2009 12:37:49 PM PST by Natural Law
We have two options in life, either we live life subscribing to lies or subscribing to truth. It’s the belief in lies that has been so harmful. I’m less concerned about appearing mean spirited than I am about leading people to the light of truth. That’s why I try to follow Jesus and not men.
I have never advocated ascribing to or propagating lies. I am just proposing that we sift through the immense pile of Bovine Scat given to us by the left and the MSM to find the useful kernels of oats. It is possible to co-opt the virtue in King's message and use it to begin disassembling the socialist machine facing us.
The alternative is to stick to the four legs good, two legs bad, MLK was a complete scoundrel story line while that machine consumes you and your remaining freedoms.
The man doesn’t need to be talked about at all.
“Now THAT is something you’ll hardly ever hear these days.”
Because it’s not true. At least not after 1960.
I never heard of that. I knew he was pro-segregation but that's all.
Alveda King is a Republican, but she herself was a Democrat during her time in the GA House and only became a Republican when she became a pro-life activist. Her grandfather was a Republican until the summer of 1960, a Democrat afterwards. The reference her uncle was a Republican is predicated on the assumption he was like his father, but even if he was for a brief period of time (again, we do not know if he voted for Stevenson in ‘52 & ‘56), he was clearly not one from after the summer of 1960.
The problem with these articles is that they go on a false assumption. MLK embraced a viewpoint that became more leftist and radical by the year up until his death. These aren’t views we’d embrace today as Republicans in the least. The MLK of 1955 was not the MLK of 1968. But we’ve discussed this in many threads ever since Rice’s piece came out. We discussed it in this one today:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/2167898/posts
There are links to prior discussions as well. Even if it can be proven he supported the GOP in the 1950s, it would be like writing a piece on Jim Jeffords or Lincoln Chafee. We know that NY Democrat Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. endosed Ike in 1956, but that was the one and only time. They were back on the Dem plantation by 1960. They’re better off focusing on known facts, including those pertaining to the Democrat party’s racist history and contrasting it with the GOP, and covering those individuals in history we know were Republicans, such as Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington.
Thank you.
With a few more brick the building of The Myth will be complete and all can worship Saint Martin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.