If that poll is accurate it doesn’t show that “scientific reality” is getting through to Americans, it means that the lies and deceit of the denial lobby has polluted America.
Debating global warming with people on the internet who are hampered by the belief that it’s a partisan issue is a big waste of time, but if you wish to show me what “science” points to an earth wobble instead of human activity being the cause of your current global warming, I’ll bite.
If that poll is accurate it doesn’t show that “scientific reality” is getting through to Americans, it means that the lies and deceit of the denial lobby has polluted America.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
At least it is getting through to you that not all your fellow citizens are falling for this hoax. Thus your demand that conservatives fall in line with the overwhelming consensus is premature to say the least.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
...if you wish to show me what “science” points to an earth wobble instead of human activity being the cause of your current global warming, I’ll bite.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We already did that. And I observed your fixed obtuseness to the cogent posting of many other Freepers.
You proved that between us, I have a graduate degree in science and have done original research. Between us I understand graduate level statistics and have read the philosophy of science.
You have a strong understanding of the word consensus. And are so wedded to your new religion that you cringe from addressing the several scientific data points I and others presented you.
We won’t do that again.
You can call me an ignorant troglodyte and all the other names that your fellow watermelons (red inside green outside) favor. I will call you an unlearned dupe. Not productive.
My solution is to ensure that no one else on the site wastes the time like I and other Freepers did by pointing out the poverty and rigidity of your position and reliance on name calling. Thus saving everyone a lot of time.
Please show us the "evidence" that C02 at such low levels as we have today (nearly all of the existing CO2 is of natural origins) is even remotely capable of warming the entire Earth. Fact is, there is ZERO evidence in the geologic record that CO2 at anywhere near such low concentrations as we have today has ever resulted in global warming.