Forced ‘Tolerance’ (New Jersey Town Forced to Accommodate Same-Sex Unions)

NCR ^ | January 21, 2009 | DENNIS POUST

[Verginius Rufus]

This seems to be a matter of state law, so the Constitutional limitation on what Congress can do doesn't apply. Of course our courts just make up the law as they see fit, regardless of what Congress does.

A few years ago I was in Canada and remember a news story on the radio about a Catholic high school which was forced to allow a homosexual student to bring his boyfriend to the prom as his date. Canada is just a few steps further down the slippery slope than the US is.

[MissEdie]

Thank you for answering my questions.

[Question_Assumptions]

Close it to the public or tear it down so that nobody gets it.

[NYer]

At what point will we fight? Will we simply allow our freedoms to be steadily encroached on?

The battle lines are being drawn. The White House web site clearly spells out the new president's agenda.

Wake up America!

[Reaganesque]

Old, Out of fashion intolerance:

Today's Updated, Hip Intolerance:

[ViLaLuz]

How can two gays loving each other be a threat to you? </s>

[fwdude]

Leftist homo-activists inject themselves and their perverse values into every conceivable area of normal people’s lives by deeming certain things as “public accommodations.” As the marxists gain control of the language through liberal courts (aka: political correctness) there is nothing they can’t get labeled a public accommodation. Thus, if something a private organization does touches someone or something, however tangentially, who government has ever benefited or regulated, then the private organization or individual must bow to the government’s regulation, no matter how onerous and unconstitutional. It then becomes impossible to conceive of ANY activity or association that can be considered sacred by the basic precepts of the Constitution.