The 'Polarik' work is filed as evidentiary in the Berg suits and the following is filed as a portion of a legitimate exhibit in the Orly Taitz lawsuit in CA on behalf of Alan Keyes:
Sandra Ramey’s comments re Polarik: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2155990/posts [I wonder, did mlo post on that thread, showing he is once again trying to deceive readers by pretending there is no other witness to Obama's 'inadequate' Internet posting of a supposed CoLB?]
Full PDF version here: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/executedsandralinesdeclaration_1.pdf
"However, the bigger story to this lawsuit is the fact that forensic document examiner Sandra Ramsey Lines (pictured) has documented in an associated affidavit (PDF) the following:
2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet from “Ron Polarik,” [PDF] who has declined to provide his name because of a number of death threats he has received. After my review and based on my years of experience, I can state with certainty that the COLB presented on the internet by the various groups, which include the “Daily Kos,” the Obama Campaign, “Factcheck.org” and others cannot be relied upon as genuine. Mr. Polarik raises issues concerning the COLB that I can affirm. Software such as Adobe Photoshop can produce complete images or alter images that appear to be genuine; therefore, any image offered on the internet cannot be relied upon as being a copy of the authentic document.
3. Upon a cursory inspection of the internet COLB, one aspect of the image that is clearly questionable is the obliteration of the Certificate No. That number is a tracking number that would allow anyone to ask the question, “Does this number refer to the Certification of Live Birth for the child Barack Hussein Obama II?” It would not reveal any further personal information; therefore, there would be no justifiable reason for oliterating it.
4. In my experience as a forensic document examiner, if an original of any document exists, that is the document that must be examined to obtain a definitive finding of genuineness or non-genuineness. In this case, examination of the vault birth certificate for President-Elect Obama would lay this issue to rest once and for all.
Jim, this sort of deceit on the part of mlo --to name but one-- pretending there is nothing that has been shown at FR for weeks now repeatedly is why FR is losing credibility as a coservative website dedicated to the Constitutional framework. How many readers passing through FR daily see the lies of an mlo and don't happen to be back around when the exposure of the lies is posted? Allowing this deceit protecting these purposed deceivers using Alinsky methodology is devastating and quite useful to the obamanoid platoon. I don't support Freerepublic to give these liars a venue where they are protected as they lie and play Alinsky games repeatedly.
How many times do you have to asked to express your disagreements without attacking people?
The fact that the same claims have been repeated does not somehow make them true or unquestionable. Why don't I accuse you of lying for pretending you haven't seen the rebuttals?
Lines endorsed *none* of the forgery allegations that were made about this document.
These facts have also been repeated to you previously.
Folks ought to know on which side of the bread it's buttered.