you lack the data with weight to prove it.
I do this for a living, but its also a hobby. Go do your own digging, and comeback when you can respond to facts presented with something other than a reference to his The Hilton, or advancing your opinion on it being (to sum up your previous arguments) "unthinkable" .
Looking at the totality of the evidence, if I had to report with a recommendation on whether call in an airstrike based on the data available, I would. There is just too much that, when you divorce it from his name, screams "thrown campaign".
I'm beginning to wonder about your objectivity. You seem to be obsessively discounting the data.
Honestly, I don't understand your position, it seem to make little sense.
And, so far, you've been found wanting.
Ya got nothin’.