To: Sub-Driver
With are the homeless in that area, I am surprised there were any soda cans left. I would have picked those up. Have you seen the price for aluminum?
13 posted on
01/23/2009 8:09:17 AM PST by
DYngbld
(Aspire to inspire before you expire)
To: All
Ohhhhhh how that article title just BEGS for it.....
16 posted on
01/23/2009 8:13:18 AM PST by
awakened
(Remember -- There are no dead atheists.)
To: DYngbld
You forgot that as of Noon Tuesday there aren’t any homeless and there won’t be for the next four years.
24 posted on
01/23/2009 8:21:02 AM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
To: DYngbld
It took 13 posts for that thought to come up ... it was the first thing I thought of.
I'm no statistician, but ... the overtime for the feds, and perhaps the city, additional fuel cost to collect and transport the garbage to the appropriate facility ( did they separate as they collected ? ), the cost for the carbon credits to offset all this pollution, minus the value of the plastic and aluminum ... I think it's a net loss of millions.
But OH! Wasn't he just dreamy ?
Damn!
I just puked on my keyboard and added to the cost .. I have to buy more plastic and throw this one away ... and I will NOT separate it, neither.
35 posted on
01/23/2009 9:04:11 AM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: DYngbld
ah, but the Homeless still aren’t allowed into the area. Besides. homelessness is only a problem during Republican administrations. . .
42 posted on
01/23/2009 9:39:19 AM PST by
Salgak
(Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson