Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Was a Big-Government Disaster (Bush Legacy Must Read)
Wall Street Journal ^ | January 24, 2009 | Nick Gillespie

Posted on 01/24/2009 4:03:45 AM PST by Zakeet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Zakeet

Somewhere (over the rainbow?) surely there is a world for all the Bush haters,a place to cuss and moan till your dying days


61 posted on 01/24/2009 8:22:32 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth

here’s my def of conservative: if he liberal press hates you, you’re a conservative. a second is like unto it: if you don’t jump on the elitist band wagon of the moment(in Bush’s time, 1.global warming, 2. universal health care), you’re a conservative , and willing to pay a huge price for it.


62 posted on 01/24/2009 8:24:39 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: abb
The states have to be big to compete with the Federal behemoth -- and the Constitution, original intent, allows any state to be as big as it needs be -- it is the FEDERAL government which is to be limited. If Jindal is for having the States carry the load, that could mean he is for the Federal government not to.

Since the states COMPETE with one another -- competition for the good -- States can be very effective, in theory. What is hibbling is when we have basket cases like California and Michician getting bailed out by the fed, or states begging the fedgov to take over state programs.

If there is any hope of recovering from the economic calamity coming at us due to a congestive heart failing, morbidly obese, diabetic, and senility insane FedGov, it is in the states getting stronger, and taking over some key roles that the FedGov now has -- notably (1) the issuance of money and (2) business regulation.

63 posted on 01/24/2009 8:25:14 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Edit35

exactly right, again the big picture, 10,000 expected deaths, actual 1,000.


64 posted on 01/24/2009 8:26:38 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: woofie

****Somewhere (over the rainbow?) surely there is a world for all the Bush haters,a place to cuss and moan till your dying days*****

Good, because he sure screwed this place up.


65 posted on 01/24/2009 8:28:16 AM PST by liliesgrandpa (Just out of curiosity, is there any possible GOP candidate that is too repugnant for you to support?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: bvw

Government AT ALL LEVELS - local, state or federal has too much power and seizes too much of the people’s money.

Period.

Any discussion about conservatism that deviates from this basic principle enunciated by Ronald Reagan is not useful.


66 posted on 01/24/2009 8:32:04 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gracesdad
Bush brought us Obama.

This is the epitomy of a dunderhead view of the world ... The American people brought you Obama, they also brought you George Washingston, Nixon and Carter. Get over it.

67 posted on 01/24/2009 8:33:16 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: abb
Reagan was a great speaker and stood the USSR down.

But what of his actions? California, his state, is a dead man walking. Under Reagan, the Fedgov grew.

You don't peel an onion from the inside.

68 posted on 01/24/2009 8:36:03 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: liliesgrandpa
Good, because he sure screwed this place up.

And what the hell have you done but moan?

I would love to see one of you guys last a day in the most powerful postion in the world.

69 posted on 01/24/2009 8:42:31 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: bvw
But what of his actions? California, his state, is a dead man walking. Under Reagan, the Fedgov grew.

Agreed. But I think (and this is my opinion) he tried to limit its growth and was sincere in his beliefs toward that end. It would be interesting to see what could have been done if Reagan and the 1994 GOP House and Senate were all together.

But what do do now? Money has somehow got to be shut off flowing to government. Personally, I think if withholding were done away with, things would work out pretty damn quick.

70 posted on 01/24/2009 8:44:05 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: abb
Big Government Republicanism. This is something that all who are pushing Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana need to know about. I live here and know the man well. He too is a Big Government Republican.

Doesn't matter. All conservatives and Republicans care about anymore is race, ethnicity, gender, and pandering. And it's no coincidence that they are now becoming consistent losers who are tearing up the country as much as the Democrats and liberals.

71 posted on 01/24/2009 8:53:45 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb
Money has somehow got to be shut off flowing to government. Personally, I think if withholding were done away with, things would work out pretty damn quick.

If I am not mistaken, when he was governor of California, Reagan eliminated (or proposed the elimination of) the withholding of state income taxes so as to demonstrate to people how much their state government was costing them.

I believe Prop. 13 followed in short order.

72 posted on 01/24/2009 9:03:45 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: steveyp
How could anyone have understood Compassionate Conservatism to mean anything but more government intrusion in the lives of the citizenry?

Because we were sick of the Clintons, and we assumed that any Republican would naturally follow the example of Reagan.

73 posted on 01/24/2009 9:05:43 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: okie01

I remember one thing that precipitated Prop 13 was the inflationary increases in Cali property values during the 70s. Hugh property tax increases also resulted.


74 posted on 01/24/2009 9:13:12 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: woofie

****And what the hell have you done but moan? *****

I voted for the Constitution Party. I encouraged everyone to do the same. Check my previous posts.

I wrote my Representatives, Senators, and Presidents.

Thanks for your interest.


75 posted on 01/24/2009 9:32:18 AM PST by liliesgrandpa (Just out of curiosity, is there any possible GOP candidate that is too repugnant for you to support?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

***Think for a moment about the thousands of Transportation Security Administration screeners — newly minted government employees all***

>>>To be fair, Bush did not want these people to be goobermint employees. That was the price ‘rats extracted for approving the Homeland Security bill. The screeners before 9/11 were doing just fine and needed no replacement. But they weren’t union y’see.

A small point, but if this guy is misleading on small points who knows what error he introduces on larger points. >>>

You’re absolutely right about both points.


76 posted on 01/24/2009 11:36:09 AM PST by kitkat (THE DAY WE LOSE OUR WILL TO FIGHT WILL BE THE DAY WE LOSE OUR FREEDOM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kindred
The only hope we conservatives have is to start a new conservative party for conservatives only that will run only true conservatives for any and all political offices.

The first problem is defining conservative. The term has no meaning anymore.

Both freetraders and protectionists claim to be conservative. Both pro-abortion and pro-life people claim to be conservative. Both interventionists internationally and isolationists claim to be conservative. People on both sides of the debate over homosexual marriage claim to be conservative. The "conservatives" spent more money faster than any other entity in the history of the world from 2000-2006.

Reagan assembled a coalition of libertarians, fiscal conservatives and social conservatives. Through his political genius, he also made being a Republican "cool," attracting the politically unaligned. These are not natural bedfellows, and now everyone is pointing fingers at everyone else claiming that to make things work, we have to start out by kicking one of the other groups out.

The big push now is to get rid of the pro-lifers and the social conservatives. That's roughly 1/3rd of the electorate.

Me? My business is going well and I'm sitting out for a while on politics. Life's good and I spent nearly twenty years at the local level in Republican politics trying to get these bozos to play nice. I can't be of any benefit anymore, and I'm not going to get an ulcer trying to get people to get along when they'd rather lose and kick everyone else out of the room.

77 posted on 01/24/2009 12:27:34 PM PST by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22

“The honest conservative answer to that answer is “NO”.”

Are you saying our military build-up, WOT, Homeland Security and other security costs are not the primary reason for the increased number receiving government checks and increase in budget??


78 posted on 01/24/2009 1:02:00 PM PST by elpadre (nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Not quite.
Even defense of the Republic has to live within the means. The pork that was used as currency to buy that defense from the left is inexcusable. Conservative principles still apply and it has to be within the constraints of the ability of a free market economy being able to afford them long term.


79 posted on 01/24/2009 5:50:47 PM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: EnglishOnly

Can’t say I have much to add to that. It is very nice he’s gone. Pity about Obama, though. Prep for another 4 years of lunacy in government.


80 posted on 01/25/2009 6:40:58 AM PST by wgflyer (Liberalism is to society what HIV is to the immune system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson