Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Philo-Junius
The slave states gave consent to their lack of representation in Congress by their secession and participation in the insurrection.

Then how could they ratify anything?

54 posted on 01/25/2009 1:56:57 PM PST by Puddleglum (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Puddleglum

The state legislatures continued to exist, even in insurrection. When they decided they wanted their representation back, they agreed to ratify the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments.

It was strictly business; you can’t call a negotiation compulsion just because the other party requires you to make concessions to finalise the deal.

The slave states wanted something back they had given away: their representation in Congress. In order to get it back they had to deal with the new amendments.

A bad deal, maybe, but that’s what happens when gamble on an appeal to arms and lose.


56 posted on 01/25/2009 2:03:32 PM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson