Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; markomalley; P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg

I agree. If PRIVATE corporations want to extend full benefits for homosexual partners, they certainly have that right; however, this is the taxpayer’s money we are talking about here.


20 posted on 01/27/2009 6:02:33 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee; P-Marlowe; enat; Dr. Eckleburg

And even with private corporations, I don’t want private corps I have bought stock in, giving away medical benefits to anyone who wants to pick up a roommate.

(Says one guy to another - “Here’s the deal: you pay me 85% of a health policy, and I’ll get both of us benefits.”)


22 posted on 01/27/2009 6:12:05 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; xzins

We already pay for consequences of all forms of fornication (see: abortion)....soon it will be this one too. This administration is moving lightening speed. You’d think that Bambi knew he only has 2 terms to kill and steal.


23 posted on 01/27/2009 6:18:19 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson