ping
*snort* The Dems have never been famous for their logic.
The LEFT controls the “education” of 90% of Americans. Which means that the LEFT controls a trillion-dollar-a-year chain of recruitment centers, which control 90% of American for eight hours a day, from age 5 to age 18. Each year, they churn out millions of graduates and dropouts—i.e., people who have been SUCCESSFULLY indoctrinated into slavery and collectivism, but UNSUCCESSFULLY trained in reading, arithmetic, and reasoning about such things as liberty.
The RIGHT has NO REMOTELY COMPARABLE mechanisms for spreading its understanding of the world and human nature.
All this bickering about talk radio, a little tax cut here and there, a little de-funding of this or that—is, to coin a phrase, rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
The LEFT’s goal is the utter destruction of the anti-collectivist U.S. Constitution. The LEFT is getting near the end-game, which it has been working toward, with a coherent strategy, since 1830 or earlier. The RIGHT lurches from Nixon to Ford to Reagan to Bush to Dole to Bush to McLame—no vision, no goals, no strategy, no insight. And Republican First Ladies and officeholders who “champion education” by heaping praise on “our” public schools.
0bummer killed his Presidency when he brought Rush into it. Sayonara, DUmmie!
My letter:
Dear Rush,
You are right about Obama.
Go Cardinals.
Sincerely,
Jeff *********
Chandler, AZ
Imagine if the Republican party singled out for destruction a private citizen who spoke their mind politically.
The LameStream Media would rush to their defense. Pun intended.
GIVE EM HELL RUSH
Here is my response sent to the DCCC:
Thank you Rush for speaking the truth, saying what the American people have no voice to say and doing it boldly, without fear!
The outrageous hypocrites of the DCCC and the old media hoped that President Bush failed for eight years and actively lied to and deceived the American people every day with that agenda.
Thank you Rush for being there for us! We hope you succeed for America!
I signed it with my kudos to Rush.
Better yet, here is the comment link for the DCCC to send them a copy of your comments on Rush...
http://www.dccc.org/page/s/contact
This is not about Rush. People miss the point, it’s shifting the focus away from what they want to pas in Congress, it’s also designed to make Rush a Pariah and an excuse for passing ridiculous hate legislation as the left has done everywhere else. This is about getting total dominating control of the media and insuring a dumb public that will voe for them no matter what.
Democrats begin waiting for George W. Bush to fail
The Seattle Times ^ | jan 9, 2001 | E.J. Dionne Jr.
I sent my email to the Dimms. Asked big brother to leave Rush alone and focus on the biggest pile of pork ever to hit the beltway.
Rush Derangement Syndrome.
The liberal notion that people vote for conservatives and think in conservative ways solely because of Rush Limbaugh would not explain how Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale.
There is a simpler explanation. Liberals can't stand being ridiculed and made fun of. They listen to Rush more than conservatives and Republicans do. Deep down they know that much of what he says has some truth to it. Rush lands some pretty good shots on liberals. The imitations of Clinton and Paul Shanklin's songs remind them just how seedy their liberal program has been and how creey the liberal leaders are.
Liberals want to believe that no one could possibly be conservative for rational reasons. So they perpetuate the fantasy that Rush Limbaugh causes conservatism. It's a bogeyman theory. This relieves them of the more complicated process of examining how crazy and nutty liberals are and why people really do not like liberals or liberalism.
The liberals who actually call in to argue with or heckle Rush are good examples of Rush Derangement Syndrome. It's easier for them to focus on Rush and their anger about his show than to remember how creepy the Clintons were, how odd Gore and Kerry were, and that liberal policies drive the country deeper into debt.
In the 1970s it was even easier for them because they had their own Alinskian TV show in which Archie Bunker played the role of the unattractive conservative scapegoat. Deep down they enjoy having Limbaugh as a scapegoat to blame and one who absolves them from any deeper rational thoughts or self-examination. If they ever succeeded in having Limbaugh driven off the air they would have to invent a new one. Liberals always need an Elmer Gantry, Huey Long, Jesse Helms, Tom DeLay, Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson or Limbaugh to point to as an unattractive example of what they don't like. It is part of their Manichean worldview.
They need the stereotype of the conservative philistine or armchair bigot with weight problems to make them feel better about themselves as they attempt to bankrupt the country and depopulate the planet,
sometimes with a lecherous hillbilly at the helm who is an even more unattractive stereotype for whom they put on their liberal beer goggles. They have no problem indulging the liberal philistines, nutjobs, or lunatic.
And that's why Limbaugh stays in business. It's a symbiotic relationship.
They want to take away our rights to freely express ourselves.
They will not succeed.
