To: M. Dodge Thomas
Dont want to rain on your argument, but there was
a conspiracy. When two or more people meet legally
for illegal purposes, or meet illegally for legal purpose,
it is a conspiracy (for the 'little people').
Want to see what a high level ex parte conspiracy looks like?
23 posted on
01/28/2009 7:24:12 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Diogenesis
You have some proof that they met legally for illegal purposes or illegally met for legal purposes? Your proof of a conspiracy requires proof of the statement above.
And we have none.
27 posted on
01/28/2009 7:52:29 AM PST by
dmz
To: Diogenesis; dascallie
Even when presented with photographic evidence of an ex parte meeting neo-conservatives deny it. Conspiracy is a word neo-cons use to silence genuine conservatives.
34 posted on
01/28/2009 8:24:49 AM PST by
Nephi
(Like the failed promise of Fascism, masquerading as Capitalism? You're gonna love Marxism.)
To: Diogenesis; Amityschild; BIGLOOK; yefragetuwrabrumuy; Spunky; An American In Dairyland; ...
Dont want to rain on your argument, but there was
a conspiracy. When two or more people meet legally
for illegal purposes, or meet illegally for legal purpose,
it is a conspiracy (for the 'little people').It's only a conspiracy if one or more of them takes any action to forward the plans.
Otherwise it's words, just words...
76 posted on
01/28/2009 10:46:04 AM PST by
null and void
(We are now in day 9 of our national holiday from reality.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson