[DesertRhino]

He never did. That has been debunked. Sorry, nice try, but a scanned copy on a website he funded, proves nothing. It shows every sign of alteration and fraud. Starting with the fact that the number is obscured.

And if his intent was to “release it” why is it he won’t authorize any news organization or person, to view the original in Hawaii? It’s locked away. the info should be a perfect match to the one he put online,,huh?

[houston1]

everyone’s birth certificate is sealed, except to themselves and certain relatives, try getting G.W. Bush’s birth certificate from Mass. and see how far you get

[mlo]

"He never did. That has been debunked."

It was not debunked. Some guy on the internet posted an amateurish "analysis".

"And if his intent was to “release it” why is it he won’t authorize any news organization or person, to view the original in Hawaii? It’s locked away. the info should be a perfect match to the one he put online,,huh?"

What is your evidence that any news organization has asked and been refused?

"It shows every sign of alteration and fraud. Starting with the fact that the number is obscured."

There are no signs of fraud. The number was obscured on the scanned image because the person that did it though it might be sensitive. But it's not hidden here: