[Protect the Bill of Rights]

It would take some cold, hard damning facts before I would consider Roberts, Scalia, Thomas or Alito (who was absent) would be in on any type of fix. It would have to be a cold day in hell when I was reading those facts.

It is valid to question Obama’s eligibility for office. Surprising little is known about the man who just today invoked the “sunlight is the best dininfectant” line. I have many questions about Obama’s past.

But assuming the fix is in on the SCOTUS based on nothing more than a meeting (even if unprecedented) is what feeds stereotype of conservatives being right wing nuts. It is the type of thing which keeps many from taking us seriously.

Not slamming anyone else for what they believe, just my opinion.

[dmz]

But assuming the fix is in on the SCOTUS based on nothing more than a meeting (even if unprecedented) is what feeds stereotype of conservatives being right wing nuts. It is the type of thing which keeps many from taking us seriously.
______

And the fact that the meeting was not unprecedented should give the conspiracy theorists a bit of a pause, but it doesn’t seem to do so.

[little jeremiah]

I also find it very hard to believe that Scalia, Thomas and Alito would subvert the Constitution for any reason. That is why I am adopting a “wait and see” attitude.