Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP Analysis: Stimulus bill that's not all stimulating
AP via Google News ^ | January 30, 2009 | By ANDREW TAYLOR

Posted on 01/30/2009 3:04:22 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

WASHINGTON (AP) — They call it "stimulus" legislation, but the economic measures racing through Congress would devote tens of billions of dollars to causes that have little to do with jolting the country out of recession.

There's $345 million for Agriculture Department computers, $650 million for TV converter boxes, $15 billion for college scholarships — worthy, perhaps, but not likely to put many Americans back to work quickly.

Yes, there are many billions of dollars in "ready-to-go" job-creating projects in President Barack Obama's economic stimulus bill. But there are also plenty of items that are just unfinished business for Congress' old bulls.

An $800 billion-plus package, it turns out, gives lawmakers plenty of opportunities to rid themselves of nagging headaches left over from the days when running up the government's $10 trillion-plus debt was a bigger concern.

There's $1 billion to deal with Census problems and $88 million to help move the Public Health Service into a new building next year. The Senate would devote $2.1 billion to pay off a looming shortfall in public housing accounts, $870 million to combat the flu and $400 million to slow the spread HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases such as chlamydia.

"I have communicated to the administration that there are parts of this package that don't meet the test that they themselves established of temporary, timely and targeted," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D. He wants Obama to weigh in to knock out the clunkers during House-Senate negotiations.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
I suspect if another vote would be taken next week there would be more than 11 House democrats who would support this economic political stimulus plan.
1 posted on 01/30/2009 3:04:22 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Everyone needs to call their electeds of both parties and make sure they know what we think about this crap. As we saw with The House, there are Democrat individuals who can be persuaded that Porkulus is not in their best interest. And Republican unanimity is important for reasons many have already discussed.

Jamie Dupree (on Neil Boortz' show a couple days ago) mentioned that politicians are not yet seeing a lot of heat from their constituents on the stimulus/pork bill.

I just called both of my (Democrat) senators' offices and got right through. No waiting. One sounded receptive and the other was at least non-hostile.

If we crank this up, we might be able to hold back Porkulus like we held back the Amnesty Bill.

www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

2 posted on 01/30/2009 3:10:01 PM PST by snarkpup (We need to replace our politicians before they replace us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"I have communicated to the administration that there are parts of this package that don't meet the test that they themselves established of temporary, timely and targeted," said Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D. He wants Obama to weigh in to knock out the clunkers during House-Senate negotiations.

He's saying, we can no longer rush this garbage through, so some of it has to go.

And you statement should say!!

I suspect if another vote would be taken next week there would be more than 11 House democrats who would NOT support this economic political stimulus plan.

3 posted on 01/30/2009 3:10:19 PM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

And the democrats own it. Perhaps the reason they are upset at the “partisanship” of all the republicans voting against it because they know it is a big flying pig?


4 posted on 01/30/2009 3:12:58 PM PST by monkeybrau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeybrau

agreed..they didn’t get the republican support they needed for finger pointing purposes, now they need a reason to shoot it down, or pare it WAY down..they know it’s a clunker..


5 posted on 01/30/2009 3:15:24 PM PST by GeorgiaDawg32 (A democrat will break your leg, then hand you a crutch and take credit for your being able to walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
They call it "stimulus" legislation...

Propagandists, their enablers and dim-witted hangers-on create the terminology, control the debate and amplify the misconceptions/lies.

6 posted on 01/30/2009 3:21:55 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

From AP? Has hell frozen over?


7 posted on 01/30/2009 3:38:49 PM PST by Neverforget01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

Reinforcements!

http://www.cato.org/special/stimulus09/cato_stimulus.pdf


8 posted on 01/30/2009 3:41:28 PM PST by Melian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
And you statement should say!!

Thanks, a typo on my part.

9 posted on 01/30/2009 3:43:00 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Maybe it should be referred to as the “simulating stimulating” legislation.


10 posted on 01/30/2009 4:12:34 PM PST by jwparkerjr (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
If the AP is reporting this thing blowing up with Democrat Senator critics quoted, it's in VERY big trouble.

The good ship "S.S. Obama" has hit a huge iceberg, is ripped open and she's taking on water.

11 posted on 01/30/2009 4:27:01 PM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Exactly right. The Democrats certainly view this as quite stimulating.


12 posted on 01/30/2009 4:35:56 PM PST by DoughtyOne (D1: Home of the golden tag line: FBI cuts off CAIR for contact with Hamas, Obama wants to talk to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I hope this bill flunks in the Senate. The US will not survive with such a bill.


13 posted on 01/30/2009 4:40:14 PM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Meanwhile, in her latest TV interview, Queen Nancy had this to say about the Republicans:”Off with their heads!”


14 posted on 01/30/2009 4:51:21 PM PST by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

AP reports problems????
This is truly a flying pig moment!


15 posted on 01/30/2009 5:38:26 PM PST by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson