Of course this is a DIET soda!!
Posted on 02/02/2009 4:04:16 AM PST by TornadoAlley3
There’s something about little girls and kitties, isn’t there?
She didn’t exactly “neak” them in, she just let them in while we were downstairs, she has no qualms about letting them in when we’re up here, for that matter we let them in also!
Heck, last night my husband insisted she bring one of them in, so it would leave the cheese and buns alone while he was grilling burgers. The sneaky thing jumped up on the deck railing and came around the back of the grill.......he always has an audience when he is at the grill. Those critters can hear him lighting it no matter where they are and they all come a running.
Hmmmmmmmmm.......that might make a great SB ad for next year. After all, the guys who did the Doritos ad with the snowglobe had no ad experience. Maybe I could convince Omaha steaks to fund an ad..........LOL!!!
That’s the ticket!!!!
Once, I think.
Not 4 hours but enough to ruin a good game.
What’s a picture of Hillary doing here?
***OMG! Just spit coffee all over my screen!***
Baiting suit! Best typo ever! I like being "baited". LOL.
Yikes!
spellcheck fail!
Of course this is a DIET soda!!
I didn’t see the porn, but hubby did. He grabbed the remote, turned off the tv, told the children to leave the room, and then turned the tv back on. I looked up, saw nothing on the tv, and wondered what in the world he was doing. He explained what had happened. Earlier in the broadcast, there had been another glitch, and hubby though it more of the same. It seemed to be a satellite issue that hit Comcast’s satellite. I later heard others talking about this, so I better understood why hubby turned off the tv. We didn’t see the full frontal male nude shot. I bet the Obama FCC does nothing about this.
That's the link for an update on the story. Does this tampering with the digital signal prove why switching to all digital is stupid?
David Stern = commissioner of the NBA. Took over in 1984 and been altering the outcomes of games, championship matchups, and players stats via his crew of refs since he took over.
OH, that david stern. I thought you meant Howard Stern. The MO would have worked.
“Agreed the officiating was lousy. Why Harrison wasn’t ejected is beyond me.”
Probably saved because he didn’t throw a punch. That’s usually the line.
But the classless obnoxiousness is still too much and it’s odd how this behavior isn’t punished sufficiently.
Maybe the NFL will look at it. It’s strange as certain infractions can really hurt a team and others seem not to impact as large.
How many people have seen you in that condition out on a public sidewalk?
_____
I’m guessing you haven’t been to a public beach in 40 or 50 years.
I was always under the impression that pornography had, as one of its hallmarks, sexual behavior. By your definition, it appears that the threshold for pornography is significantly less ... if you can see any skin above and beyond the hands, neck and face, what you are seeing is pornographic.
That's a non sequitur. Sounds like you're debating yourself.
That’s not the issue. How many women do you see on a public beach dressed like the woman in the commercial was after the Doritos crunch thing?
You’re trying to make the same moral equivalence argument netmilsmom made. That is: B = C, therefore A = C, without first proving that A = B.
In this case, A dopes not equal B. Wearing a bikini on a public beach does not equal wearing bra, panties, garter, stockings and high heels on a public street. (Or on a public beach, for that matter.)
I guess what it comes down to for me is that your charge of the ad being pornographic has yet to be demonstrated.
A little racy (and I do mean a little) does not equal porno.
You’ve lost the debate, savedbygrace.
YOU see the garb as sexual. I see it as underwear, as do many of the posters here. Understanding that by the clock on YouTube, the image of the woman in undies is on less than 3 ticks, you are easily titillated. Most men have more self control.
Who knows, maybe you’re not a man. I have no clue, but comparing a woman in underwear on a screen for 3 seconds to porn, is what makes conservatives look loony.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
