Red herring question.
Here’s the problem with your hole position. Basically you’re saying that a guy that smokes pot is bad because a fellow “employee” of the guy that sold the pot to a guy who sold the pot to a guy who sold the pot to a guy who sold the pot to the guy smoking the pot killed an innocent bystander. If you’re going to play six degrees of seperation on guilt like that we’re all going to hell.
No I am not saying the guy who smokes is bad. I am saying his actions cause bad things to happen. Take Phelps I don’t think he is bad or you was bad when you toked. I think he was ignorant of what his actions caused.
If you think it takes six degrees of separation to find an innocent victim of someone using an illegal drug then yes you are ignorant.