Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ruling grandparents too old, social workers hand brother and sister to gay men for adoption
Mail Online ^ | January 29, 2009 | Graham Grant and Marcello Mega

Posted on 02/03/2009 6:03:33 PM PST by pelican001

Two young children are to be adopted by a gay couple, despite the protests of their grandparents. The grandparents first stepped in because the children's mother was unable to look after them. The couple, who cannot be named, wanted to give the five-year-old boy and his four-year-old sister a loving home themselves. But they were ruled to be too old - at 46 and 59. The devastated grandparents were told they would never see the youngsters again unless they dropped their opposition.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: adoption; forcedadoption; gayadoption; gayagenda; homosexualagenda; nannystate; scotland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
Sorry if this has already been posted, but this story is just truly horiffic. The article says "This case, in Edinburgh, raises worrying issues about state interference in family life." Well, no SH_T!! Here you see the ultimate insanity of political correctness. Forced adoption should be here in the US very shortly.
1 posted on 02/03/2009 6:03:33 PM PST by pelican001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pelican001

2 posted on 02/03/2009 6:05:05 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pelican001

But they were ruled to be too old - at 46 and 59. The devastated grandparents were told they would never see the youngsters again unless they dropped their opposition.

I just have no words.


3 posted on 02/03/2009 6:06:40 PM PST by omega4179 (1.20.13 end of an error)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pelican001

46 adn 59!????!!!

My grandmother had a baby at 44! And Charlie Chaplin was a dad in his 70’s.

Slippery slope people!


4 posted on 02/03/2009 6:07:27 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pelican001

I’d kidnap them. Seriously.


5 posted on 02/03/2009 6:10:04 PM PST by Marie2 (Ora et labora)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
Indeed. This is "middle-aged", not "old" unless you're going by 19th century standards. They were just looking for fresh young meat adoptees to hand out those that they view as their true clientele.
6 posted on 02/03/2009 6:10:05 PM PST by coydog (Proud to have slept through the Obama coronation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pelican001

I posted yesterday that the Catholic Church in Scotland, where this is going on, were contacted by a wealthy business tycoon plus other businessmen and attorneys. This group hired a very good law firm in the area who are taking on the council who took the children away. These councils in the UK are like communist cadres.

You can search news feeds to verfiy what i said and probably get an update.


7 posted on 02/03/2009 6:11:54 PM PST by Frantzie (Boycott GE - they own NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and Universal. Boycott Disney - they own ABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pelican001

Truly nutty.


8 posted on 02/03/2009 6:13:06 PM PST by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pelican001
Dang, my wife and I are both 55. We are adopting my wife's daughter's daughter, who's seven months old. She has been with us since August and the legal adoption process moves slowly, another 6 weeks and we go in front of the judge for final decree. It would get ugly if a judge tried to pull that crap on us.
9 posted on 02/03/2009 6:14:29 PM PST by jsh3180
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Thanks for posting that. I’m glad to hear there’s hope that this travesty might be reversed.


10 posted on 02/03/2009 6:14:44 PM PST by pelican001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: coydog; autumnraine
This is "middle-aged", not "old" unless you're going by 19th century standards.

I don't even consider it "middle-aged"........but that's probably because I'm 48 and my husband is 53 and our only child is 10.

I realize this is the UK, but for crying out loud, this is downright scary.

11 posted on 02/03/2009 6:15:23 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pelican001
The grandfather was told by a social worker: 'If you couldn't support the children [in the gay adoption], if you were having contact and couldn't support the children, and were showing negative feelings, it wouldn't be in their best interests for contact to take place.'

Its time for some social workers to be hung by their heels from the nearest lamp post. What went so wrong in Britain? How does the general population stand for this crap?

12 posted on 02/03/2009 6:16:10 PM PST by One_American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pelican001; metmom; grellis; xsmommy; tioga; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; SoftballMominVA; Amelia; ...

Mom PING.........

MetMOM, I know you know who else to ping to this, I’m afraid to ping the wrong people.


13 posted on 02/03/2009 6:17:28 PM PST by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Just gay guys so they can dabble in pedophilia in the privacy of the home.

No doubt they have friends on the Council.

14 posted on 02/03/2009 6:17:57 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pelican001

That’s one of the consequences of taking away the rights of fathers. We told you so!


15 posted on 02/03/2009 6:18:03 PM PST by familyop (combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

“We are adopting my wife’s daughter’s daughter, who’s seven months old.”

Good for you! I remember getting lambasted here some time ago when I made the statement that I wouldn’t ever consider letting flesh and blood out of the family.


16 posted on 02/03/2009 6:18:26 PM PST by swmobuffalo ("We didn't seek the approval of Code Pink and MoveOn.org before deciding what to do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: coydog

Maybe it’s too old by “Socialized (therefore, rationed) Healcare”

It must truly suck.


17 posted on 02/03/2009 6:19:19 PM PST by RangerM (I'm embracing what is right-wing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

What a little doll! Good luck to you.


18 posted on 02/03/2009 6:21:08 PM PST by mplsconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

It’s more like “hell on earth”...


19 posted on 02/03/2009 6:21:20 PM PST by GOPJ (What's caused 19 deaths, makes travel difficult, and won't melt til April? Global Warming.FR:Dentist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marie2

I will probably get in trouble for saying this, but this is why we have guns.


20 posted on 02/03/2009 6:25:29 PM PST by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson