To: familyop
Michael Steele is going to be VERY good, despite any naysayers. I would also point out that several items from your list of concerns are taken out of context....such as the comments on standardized testing for students.
Go Michael!! We’re with you!! ;-))
54 posted on
02/04/2009 5:23:52 AM PST by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
To: SumProVita
Go Michael!! Were with you!! ;-)) No, WE are not with him, you may be, I am not, so don't use the we word. Many people, including me, were with Bush and look where that got us. I refuse to be sucked in by another frickin' RINO, and Mr. Steele's words clearly brand him as such. All you have to do is read and listen to the man. I am not supporting this guy, period!
57 posted on
02/04/2009 5:28:27 AM PST by
calex59
To: SumProVita
"I would also point out that several items from your list of concerns are taken out of context"
Please show us how the following statement by Michael Steele could be taken out of context.
"Society should draw lines. What do you need an assault weapon for, if you're going hunting? That's overkill. But I don't think that means you go to a total ban for those who want to use gun for skeet shooting or hunting or things like that" --Michael Steele
Regardless of whatever else he could have said, that statement is very clear. It's all over the Second Amendment discussion boards. Even if he contradicts such a statement from now on, pro-Second-Amendment voters (probably most of the voters in the Republican Party) aren't going to believe him. He's a politician. And the slicker the politician, the less voters will trust him.
64 posted on
02/04/2009 5:46:12 AM PST by
familyop
(combat engineer (combat), National Guard, '89-'96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote, http://falconparty.com/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson