Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur; wagglebee

See my reply #23. It’s because of the difference between being a public figure publicly doing something sinful and encouraging others to do the same, and a private individual who shouldn’t go to Communion until he repents. He is self-excommunicated, but does not at present need public excommunication as a disciplinary matter, whereas the politician does because he is publicly flouting the law of the Church and encouraging others to do the same.


26 posted on 02/04/2009 12:29:49 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: livius
It’s because of the difference between being a public figure publicly doing something sinful and encouraging others to do the same, and a private individual who shouldn’t go to Communion until he repents.

Then it is political, because the Church is singling out politicians and not ordinary people or other celebrities. And it wouldn't surprise me at all if the Democrats retaliated by threatening the Church's tax exempt status.

28 posted on 02/04/2009 12:32:30 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson