Abortion and euthanasia are thus crimes which no human law can claim to legitimize. There is no obligation in conscience to obey such laws; instead there is a grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection.
Torpedo Testing
Some ships need to sink.
Catholic and pro-life ping!
Who needs sovereignty? Doesn’t everyone long to be governed by people faraway who speak a different language? No?
Outside Europe, huh?
I hope that there are knowledegeable people on this thread who can answer a few obvious questions:
Broke what law, specifically?
Whose law is it?
Sovereign countries actually signed away their sovereignty to an administrative body exactly where?
What is the enforcement mechanism of the "court" which issued this decision? Is it a self appointed group of lunatics in Belgium again?
Can the "law" or the applicable agreement be viewed somewhere and, if there are voluntary signatories, are they free to withdraw without cause?
So many questions, so many moonbats celebrating...
I mean beyond the fact that a death ship is circulating the globe in search of children to kill and the abortionist and foundress is delighted with the finding.
Where are the Somali pirates when you need them?
You can't get more oxymoronic than that - we need to recognise the killing of innocent, defenseless humans as a human rights issue.
Some country should fire on this murder ship.
A nice lawyerly way of saying that the rights of the folks on the death ship to "express" themselves, trump Portugal's right to determine which vessels enter its waters. They've used a kind of "free speech" loophole, here. They're effectively saying that Portugal has stymied the supposed rights to "free speech" of the ladies on the death ship.
Ridiculous, really but we know how the game is played by now, don't we?
Let's say I wanted to sail a ship into Dutch or Belgian territorial waters which broadcast the message that homosexual acts were offensive to God. How far would that ship get, I wonder? If it wasn't sunk on sight, I think I'm safe in saying that it would receive zero help from the European Court of Human Rights. In fact, I'm willing to bet that they'd actually prosecute me for hate speech. You see, rights of ....."expression" only extend so far in today's Europe. They're bestowed upon abortionists but not Christians.
I say let the Moslems have at it. Let them overrun this European cess pit and lynch every liberal, abortion-peddling, homosexuality-promoting secular humanist they can find. Most of the remaining Christians will already have been forced into exile by that stage, anyway.
Loose lips sink ships!
whatever happened to national soveriegnty?? oh right, national socialism
Abortion and euthanasia are thus crimes which no human law can claim to legitimize. There is no obligation in conscience to obey such laws; instead there is a grave and clear obligation to oppose them by conscientious objection.
Why doesn’t Portugal simply say “FU, we are a sovereign nation and will obey our laws!”. I can’t understand why anyone would listen to a world court!
