To: Zakeet
This is like having Jimmah Cartah back in the White House. The only difference is, this time, it’s worse.
2 posted on
02/06/2009 10:06:31 AM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
( Elections have consequences.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
“This is like having Jimmah Cartah back in the White House. The only difference is, this time, it’s worse.”
Post 9/11 times are much worse indeed.
4 posted on
02/06/2009 10:07:41 AM PST by
LottieDah
(If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
To: FlingWingFlyer
Jimmy Carter with slightly darker pigmentation.
Otherwise, little difference.
Except (drum roll here) Carter actually had more experience than 0bama did before taking Office.
5 posted on
02/06/2009 10:08:28 AM PST by
mkjessup
(Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American History. Barack 0bama is his second term.)
To: FlingWingFlyer
This is like having Jimmah Cartah back in the White House. The only difference is, this time, it’s worse.Yeah, Carter merely sympathized with America's enemies.
8 posted on
02/06/2009 10:09:38 AM PST by
skeeter
To: FlingWingFlyer
At least with Jimmy Carter you didn’t have to worry that he was going to hand the country over to terrorists or create a one-party repressive state. Jimmy Carter loves America. Obama has only contempt for America. Taking America down is his mission in life. And exercising power and keeping people down and beholden to the government is what an egomaniac thrives on.
19 posted on
02/06/2009 10:21:38 AM PST by
techno
To: FlingWingFlyer
This is like having Jimmah Cartah back in the White House. The only difference is, this time, it’s worse.
Look at the bright side, at least after Carter, we got Reagan. Repeat after me, 2012, 2012...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson