Lawmakers want educator benefits exposed

'THESE ARE TAX DOLLARS' | Push for itemized breakdown of school administrators' earnings

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle want to blow the lid off "hidden benefits'' in educator salaries following Chicago Sun-Times' disclosures that some superintendent salaries in the state have climbed past $400,000.

Several legislators said they would like to see itemized breakdowns of administrators' salaries. Currently, the state Board of Education only releases an overall annual salary figure.

State lawmakers say taxpayers would be reluctant to give more money to schools when administrators like now-retired superintendents Neil Codell (left) and Laura Murray (right) were making over $400,000. (Sun-Times files)

RELATED STORIES Salary Search: What do Illinois teachers get paid? Portion of educators' pay goes unreported

Last week, the Sun-Times reported that now-retired Supt. Neil Codell was the highest-paid educator in the state, taking home $411,500 last school year, according to state records. He oversaw two schools in Niles Township High School District 219.

On his heels was Laura Murray, another now-retired superintendent, who made $402,300 while presiding over one high school in Homewood-Flossmoor District 233.

Niles board President Robert Silverman said Codell had received a "base salary'' of $182,500. But despite a Freedom of Information Act request, district officials would not itemize his pay, although they did release his contract.

State Sen. Dan Cronin, the senior Republican on the Senate Education Committee, called it "outrageous'' that a district would not itemize a superintendent's pay.

"These are tax dollars. There's an obligation to disclose to the public every dime,'' the Elmhurst lawmaker said. 'Smoke and mirrors'

Cronin said he favors requiring the state board to post an itemized breakdown of every public educator's salary on the agency's Web site. The breakdown could include base salary, bonuses, pension contributions, paid sick and vacation days and annuities.

"It's frustrating to me as a policy maker that we can't easily access reliable data about the biggest single cost in education,'' Cronin said.

Senate Education Committee Chairman James Meeks (D-Chicago) said he also favors "complete sunshine on ... hidden benefits.''

"When you see ... superintendents are making $400,000 and we're making arguments for more school funding, that's why the general public thinks that money is going to be eaten up by bureaucracy,'' said Meeks, who has protested the state's education funding system.

Even state Rep. Jerry Mitchell, a former school superintendent, favored more transparency.

"I'd feel a lot better seeing it itemized,'' said Mitchell (R-Rock Falls), a member of the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee.

"Holy cow,'' Mitchell said. "How much more is [Codell] making than the governor? Is his job more important than being responsible for the whole budget of Illinois?'' The governor's base salary is $177,412. 'Less competitive?'

Brent Clark, executive director of the Illinois Association of School Administrators, declined to say if he favored itemized disclosure of administrator salaries until he saw proposed legislation on the issue.

Clark noted that superintendent salaries in Illinois, the fifth-largest state, are among the country's highest, and "we want to make sure that anything we do is not going to . . . make Illinois less competitive for some of the top talent.''

The highest educator salaries -- including Codell's and Murray's -- were likely inflated by pension-enhancing 20 percent pay bumps that were written into many superintendent contracts before a 2005 law cracking down on the practice, Clark said. Those should disappear soon, as contracts written before the law was enacted expire, he said.

"School districts are among the biggest beneficiaries of the Obama administration's proposed stimulus package. According to The New York Times, the $150 billion earmarked for schools would effectively double federal education spending."

In NY school districts also rely on local property taxes as well as state funds (20% of which came from Wall St.)

The feds can funnel money to schools, but if the local tax base collapses, how are they going to handle that?

This porkulus bill is making alot of assumptions - that after they make their political payoffs there will still be an economy left to plunder.

This game only works so long as the citizens have something left to plunder.

Do what I did: Freedom of information request for the W-2 on each employee. Rather than photocopy each W-2 with the SS# blacked out, the district gave me a list of the names with the corresponding box 5 (Medicare wages).

Then I published the list in a full page ad in local newspaper. Guess what happened to the budget vote?

Where did you call? Did you get this information from your County District or your State?

The reason I ask, as usual the schools are begging for more money in my area. “Save Our Schools” is the latest garbage. If anyone knew how much the bureaucrats were making WITH lifetime pensions I don't think their budgets would pass either.

A big meeting is next week and I'd love to pass around those W-2’s as well!

4 posted on 02/07/2009 8:26:52 AM PST by poobear (a 2-iron is best for killing Cottonmouths, Copperheads, and Water Moccasins...)

"School districts are among the biggest beneficiaries of the Obama administration's proposed stimulus package.

Then wouldn't they be subject to Obama's 400K salary cap? Or is that just for people who work for a living.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.