Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Romulus

My post 43 explains this.

The old section Haredi are a very, very, disagreeable lot. Disagreeable to everyone.

And not without reason, the arabs (Christian and Muslim) have repeatedly tried to wipe them out since before the modern state of Israel in a series of attacks. Indeed, the current arab areas of Jerusalem were the Haredi’s homes until the pogroms of the 1920s and 30s where the arabs (again, Christian and Muslim) attacked them -— more of a tribal, than religious thing.

Haaretz (secular) hates them and also hates outside Christians.

I don’t doubt these events happened, but it’s not a Jewish vs. Christian thing.

It’s a non-zionist Haredi vs. eveyone thing.

On the other topic “occupied territories” is the preferred term of Hamas and CNN, in particular, the war-slut Christiana Amanpour. The purpose of that turn of phrase, of course, is to imply that the Jews have no right to the land of Judea and are merely “occupying” it -— like an outside invasion force.

I, G-d, Sarah Palin, and Mark Twain (in no particular order) respectfully disagree with that position.


51 posted on 02/13/2009 11:47:53 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan

Occupied territory is what it is, even if some don’t like to be reminded. I don’t consider you a trustworthy interlocutor or a person of good will. In view of your abusive and disgusting last communication to me, I see no reason to maintain a dialogue at all.


52 posted on 02/13/2009 1:11:36 PM PST by Romulus ("Ira enim viri iustitiam Dei non operatur")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson