[Buck W.]

“Almost all mutations are harmful. “

Neither true, verifiable, or even relevant. The remainder of your statement betrays a fundamental lack of understanding of natural selection, a process that is wholly consistent with belief in the Christian faith.

[GodGunsGuts]

Given your response, I would say that it is YOUR STATEMENT that betrays a FUNDAMENTAL LACK OF UNDERSTANDING of the insurmountable problems facing RM + NS with respect to functional complexity. May I suggest you read “Genetic Entropy” by John Sanford before venturing any further into territory you obviously don’t understand.

[js1138]

Neither true, verifiable, or even relevant. The remainder of your statement betrays a fundamental lack of understanding of natural selection, a process that is wholly consistent with belief in the Christian faith.

You lose the argument automatically, because GGG has invoked UPPER CASE.

UPPER CASE always wins over mixed case.

[Force of Truth]

Neither true, verifiable, or even relevant. The remainder of your statement betrays a fundamental lack of understanding of natural selection, a process that is wholly consistent with belief in the Christian faith.

Classic evolutionist argument: Ad hominem packaged in circular reasoning.

[Theo]

You’re saying that most mutations are beneficial, and that the primary document of the Christian faith is B.S.?

You’re free to live in a fantasy; it’s a free country.