FReepers 65 and older are exempt from spelling disagreements
Especially if their age and IQ are the same.
Meh- let him hurl his little childish insults- He’s just proving he isn’t interested in anythign but insulting Creationists
Here- I’ll help you out since it seems you’ve once again run away fro mthe situaiton:
Turns out that not even those studying the nylonase issue agree it didn’t infact come from preexisting info (Yet Talkorigins somehow knows better than the researchers I guess):
http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/280/47/39644 is also by Negoro and says “we conclude that the nylon oligomer hydrolase utilizes nucleophilic Ser112 as a common active site both for nylon oligomer- hydrolytic and esterolytic activities. However, it requires at least two additional amino acid residues (Asp181 and Asn266) specific for nylon oligomer-hydrolytic activity. Here, we propose that amino acid replacements in the catalytic cleft of a preexisting esterase with the {beta}-lactamase fold resulted in the evolution of the nylon oligomer hydrolase.” They conclude “the nylon oligomer-degrading enzyme (EII)is considered to have evolved from preexisting esterases with {beta}-lactamase folds.”
Whip out you insult book- you’re goign to need it apparently- Ther’e a saying that when the going gets tough, and oyu’ve got no ammo- the only recourse is to resort to name calling and childish taunts- You’ve portrayed this process to a T.