Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY
... a top climate scientist said on Saturday

Except that Chris Field is not 'a top climate scientist'. Rather, Chris Field is a professor of biological sciences. So how much confidence can one have in his pronouncements and predictions about future climate changes?

Field said "the actual trajectory of climate change is more serious" than any of the climate predictions in the IPCC's fourth assessment report called "Climate Change 2007."

Translated into plain English, that means, "the climate predictions in the IPCC's fourth assessment report were wrong". Yet rather than putting that fact into the headline, Reuters runs with the alarmist headline of "Global warming seen worse than predicted".

Those Reuters "journalists" must have been educated way beyond their native abilities. Otherwise, how could they have misunderstood something so important that is staring them in right the face, huh...

19 posted on 02/14/2009 3:38:12 PM PST by Zeppo (Save the cheerleader, save the world...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zeppo

Chris Field sits at the foot of Owl Gore.


Stanford Report, October 12, 2007
Stanford researchers who worked with Nobel-winning climate-change panel join Al Gore at press conference

When Al Gore met the press Friday morning in Palo Alto, four Stanford researchers stood by his side: Stephen Schneider, Terry Root, Chris Field and Thomas Heller.

Chris Field, professor of biological sciences and director of the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology at Stanford.


I’m just glad Obama is in office. Because he may have to lower the sea levels.


21 posted on 02/14/2009 3:58:54 PM PST by cpanter (Babies, guns and Jesus. Hot Damn! - Rush on the Palin pick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Zeppo
Except that Chris Field is not 'a top climate scientist'. Rather, Chris Field is a professor of biological sciences.

Field apparently is a scientist who publishes alarmist papers on the biological effects of climate change. So that makes him, for Reuters, a top climate scientist, even if he couldn't rank the altitudes of the thermosphere, ionosphere and mesosphere.

Chris Field: Some recent papers

2008

Campbell, J. E. and D. B. Lobell. R. C. Genova, C. B. Field. 2008. The Global Potential of Bioenergy on Abandoned Agriculture Lands. Environmental Science and Technology 42:5791–5794.

Field, C. B., J. E. Campbell, and D. B. Lobell. 2008. Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:65-72.

Houlton, B.Z., Y-P. Wang, P.M. Vitousek, and C.B. Field. 2008. A unifying framework for dinitrogen fixation in the terretrial biosphere. Nature (Letters), doi:10.1038/nature07028.

Lobell, D. B. and C. B. Field. 2008. Estimation of the carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilization effect using growth rate anomalies of CO2 and crop yields since 1961. Global Change Biology 14:39-45.

Nicholas Cahill, K. and C. B. Field. 2008. Future of the wine industry: Climate change science. Practical Winery and Vineyard 29(6):16-33.

28 posted on 02/14/2009 9:11:24 PM PST by Rastapopoulos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson