Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mojave
Bustemante would have been better? I know that you probably supported McClintock but his recent tight Congressional race showed that he couldn't have won a statewide race. A vote for McClintock would have been a vote for Bustemante. Go ahead, have at me.
18 posted on 02/15/2009 8:57:08 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: originalbuckeye
I know that you probably supported McClintock but his recent tight Congressional race showed that he couldn't have won a statewide race.

Wrong. The congressional race was as close as it was because the CA republican party leaders were against McClintock. When he wins, he does it without any help from those turncoats.

29 posted on 02/15/2009 9:19:45 AM PST by CAluvdubya (Sarah's my girl! Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: originalbuckeye
Bustemante would have been better?

Changing your story already? You originally claimed Bustamante would have been worse. Arnold has even managed to make Grey Davis look like a fiscal conservative when you compare the two economies. Your retarded RINO is the worst governor in California history.

And your contention that the Rats were in complete control of the budget is false. Look up "line item veto." Your guy Arnold is apparently too dull witted to do so.

30 posted on 02/15/2009 9:21:15 AM PST by Mojave (Barack Obama is a joke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson