To: Baladas; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ...
I wonder if they really want to take on Sheriff Arpaio?
54 posted on
02/15/2009 7:05:22 PM PST by
HiJinx
(~ Support Our Troops ~ www.AmericaSupportsYou.mil ~)
To: HiJinx
It’s the Revenge of Janet.
55 posted on
02/15/2009 7:07:27 PM PST by
TADSLOS
To: HiJinx
Conyers takes on everyone. He’s one of those people who makes a big splash to impress his constituents, when he probably does very little for them.
59 posted on
02/15/2009 9:20:22 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Resolved: Gregg, McCain, Snowe, Spectre: 2010, Collins, Graham: 2014)
To: HiJinx
I wonder if they really want to take on Sheriff Arpaio?
I wonder if Conyers would look pretty in pink?
60 posted on
02/15/2009 9:23:47 PM PST by
BIGLOOK
(Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
To: HiJinx
Which Marxist-Leninist-Latino organization is 'speaking' to Harry? Why are Democrats ALWAYS on side of the 'enemy'; the perp; the radical - all whose 'will' it is, to abuse Democracy and threaten American citizens.
Forget the 'friend of my enemy is my enemy' moral rationale - even as America 'slip-slides away'.
(The damning, criminal 'border issues' are now 'City' and quality of life and surival issues. Hell is 'slowly breaking lose here'; and when the 'sinister' finally takes over; Harry and Nancy and the Rat 'et als' will be the first to cry 'foul' against those who have fought to prevent this.) Harry is just warming up here.
62 posted on
02/16/2009 5:43:15 AM PST by
cricket
(January 20, 2009 - <I>the day the music died</I>)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson