To: Viking2002
Is it possible that they were being environmentally sensitive and not using their best sonar to avoid offending the sea people.
30 posted on
02/15/2009 5:20:47 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: cripplecreek
"Is it possible that they were being environmentally sensitive and not using their best sonar to avoid offending the sea people." I think a more likely scenario was that the Brits were hammered and the French were fornicating with themselves - sorry all Brits.
To: cripplecreek
Is it possible that they were being environmentally sensitive and not using their best sonar to avoid offending the sea people. No boomers don't use active sonar. IOW, they don't transmit. Might as well surface and start a fire in a barrel on the deck.
124 posted on
02/15/2009 8:13:18 PM PST by
El Gato
("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
To: cripplecreek
That’s what I wondered. Are they legally prevented from hurting the eardrums of whales, like we are?
140 posted on
02/16/2009 1:07:20 AM PST by
CatDancer
(tagline expired 11-4-08, please provide renewal tagline)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson