Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LuxMaker

I prefer the death penalty for this sort of thing, but maybe the judged figured that a 58 year-old wasn’t a good bet to ever get executed. The appeals process could take a decade, at which point he’s 68, and maybe by then would be in such bad health that his lawyers could claim he was no longer aware of what was going on, which would require another decade of appeals, at which point he probably would be dead and the state would have wasted millions in legal fees.

I wish you could execute guys like this, but I can’t blame the judge in this case.


8 posted on 02/15/2009 7:19:46 PM PST by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Our man in washington
“I prefer the death penalty for this sort of thing, but maybe the judged figured that a 58 year-old wasn’t a good bet to ever get executed.”

Judges can't give people the death penalty after a change of plea. There has to be a trial. And at his age, it is probably true that he would have died in prison before ever being executed, if the courts didn't overturn the death penalty sentence in this case. Allowing him to plead and accept a life sentence without the possibility of parole probably saved the taxpayers millions. Now this smug sicko will have to sit in prison for the rest of his life and think about what he has done. He's not going to like it. People in prison definitely won't be conservative enough for his tastes. Somebody might kill him just for being a jerk.

17 posted on 02/16/2009 6:41:40 AM PST by SmallGovRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson