You: Approx. 80% of American women will be infected with one or another type of genital HPV in their lifetimes, usually in their teens and 20’s. Protecting against these infections makes perfect sense. Using inflammatory terms like “whores” merely clouds the picture.
Me: LOL 80%!
If your daughter is a whore, by all means load her up with daily shots to stave off the promiscuous disease. Our daughter is not a whore and doesn't need it in her TEENS and TWENTIES.
Using PROPER terminology, a “whore” is what contracts this disease in their teens and twenties. We don't’ raise whore so it is not needed her to protect against promiscuity.
Only two groups of people have essentially no chance of developing cervical cancer. These are women who have never had sex and women who have had sex with only one man who has only had sex with her. Now, you may know with absolute certainty about how your daughter has spent all her time not under your direct supervision but can you say the same about her husband? If not, she is at risk.
Well, whores actually get paid. Many promiscuous young women give away for free what others charge for so "whore" isn't the proper term. The term I think you are looking for is "slut".
That said, part of how they discovered the relationship between STDs and cervical cancer is that many women in Latin America were not promiscuous yet they still had a very high cervical cancer rate. The problem was that their husbands were promiscuous and were cheating on them. So it's not simply a matter of how you raise your own daughter but who she marries and what he does, too.