Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NonValueAdded
"Sounds like the cops were the only ones being disorderly that day. I wonder if they are immune? Might make for an interesting countersuit. I hope Krause bankrupts that municipality when all is said and done. Malicious prosecution simply to cover a mistake, false arrest, swearing out a false affidavit (if the cops' testimony contridicts any of the paperwork). Nail ’em, Brad!"

--

"West Allis Krauseberg, Wisconsin?"

18 posted on 02/16/2009 7:39:33 PM PST by shoutingandpointing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: shoutingandpointing
From Calguns.net
Federal court

However, a Dec. 4, 2008, declaratory judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia could rattle the law enforcement establishment's legal underpinning.

In a case involving Zachary Nelson Mead, the court adopted a settlement in a case similar to Krause's, declaring that seizing a firearm for no reason except that it was openly carried violated the Fourth Amendment's protection again unreasonable search and seizure.

Krauseberg it is!!!
41 posted on 02/16/2009 8:08:09 PM PST by NonValueAdded (May God save America from its government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson