Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs; djsherin; bamahead
djsherin ,I see you attract the Bush/McCain-bots who jump in your posts to attack Paul. It’s so ironic that the major complaint about Paul is that he was against any involvement of the US in the Middle East.

Good grief, guys. This thread is swarming with Bushbots, McCainiacs, and Party Firsters.

You know, if spreading democracy in Iraq at gunpoint using our armed forces is so wonderful, then why not apply the same methods here? What's good for the goose is good for the gander; yet, those same Freepers who adamantly favor using our armed forces to conduct exercises in social engineering abroad are also adamantly against allowing our Government to run amok at home. [Well, most of them are, at least, the ones who have been indoctrinated. The ones who haven't are in favor of more Big Government bailouts and amnesties. And that interventionist way of thinking is decidedly not "conservative"; it is more...fascist, or what we call "liberal," than anything else.]

As a conservative, I am opposed to anything that expands the scope and the powers of Federal Government beyond the boundaries expressly and explicitly defined within the Constitution, the original "contract with America."

In the meantime, the confusion over what constitutes conservatism is a consequence of conservatives, primarily within the Republican Party, stupidly allowing themselves to be dragged leftward, inch by inch, over the years and the decades.

59 posted on 02/17/2009 6:27:16 AM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: rabscuttle385
I wondered how long before you would show up.

In the meantime, the confusion over what constitutes conservatism is a consequence of conservatives, primarily within the Republican Party, stupidly allowing themselves to be dragged leftward, inch by inch, over the years and the decades.

Of course, you preferred putting the Dems in charge and letting Marxism happen overnight.

63 posted on 02/17/2009 6:31:01 AM PST by A.Hun (Common sense is no longer common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
As a conservative, I am opposed to anything that expands the scope and the powers of Federal Government beyond the boundaries expressly and explicitly defined within the Constitution, the original "contract with America."

You would be called a "Constitutional Conservative", which is what I've grown into over the years, and it is where I will stay...

We need to lose the "R" and "D" and get back to the basics which is what will save both Conservatives and our Republic... The Constitution!

222 posted on 02/17/2009 1:56:10 PM PST by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: rabscuttle385
"Good grief, guys. This thread is swarming with Bushbots, McCainiacs, and Party Firsters."

In noticed that last night on a couple of threads. They've been pretty quiet the last 6 months, but have decided to crawl out from under whatever rock they were hiding.
Where were they when I wanted one of them to explain how the Bush TARP was NOT socialism.

I see they're still blaming GOP losses on conservatives, rather than on the GOP acting like Democrats.

281 posted on 02/17/2009 4:08:20 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson