Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"'This isn't just about Limbaugh or a local radio host most of us haven't heard about,' says Democrat committee member."

No, they want it all. The 'Rats have declared war on the First Amendment. They have to get the Second out of the way first though.

1 posted on 02/18/2009 9:16:40 AM PST by atomic conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: atomic conspiracy

And we shook our heads at China. Stand strong people, this ride is going to get a little rough


2 posted on 02/18/2009 9:18:48 AM PST by BornToBeAmerican (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
China Envy


3 posted on 02/18/2009 9:27:28 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 29 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

Looks like Pig Nose is up to his old tricks again. The guy makes a camels butt look attractive.


4 posted on 02/18/2009 9:27:54 AM PST by Plumberman27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
"Thanks to the stimulus package, we've established that broadband networks -- the Internet -- are critical, national infrastructure. We think that gives us an opening to look at what runs over that critical infrastructure."

It's the "People's Bandwidth" after all...

5 posted on 02/18/2009 9:30:56 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
Waxman's staff people certainly think their boss has a right to make his stuff pop up on my screen.

Boy are they wrong.

For years and years I've had my mind on software that would operate to delete both the image and voice of anyone I didn't like from my TV. For example, I'd be watching McLaughlin and Eleanor Clift would pop up. She's so bad I'd flip the switch hoping that when I tuned back to the show she'd be shut up. Should be simple for voice recognition software to handle that.

I can imagine the same thing on the internet. Something from Waxman or one of his running dog lackeys shows up trying to display on my screen, the software would just delete it.

I see sales in the hundreds of millions!

6 posted on 02/18/2009 9:32:07 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

Isn’t he the dude that looks like the “pig men” from that old “Outer Limits” series...?


7 posted on 02/18/2009 9:35:23 AM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
"Internet radio is becoming a big deal, and we're seeing that some web sites are able to control traffic and information, while other sites that may be of interest or use to citizens get limited traffic because of the way the people search and look for information,"

"The FCC and state and local governments also have oversight over the Internet lines and the cable and telecom companies that operate them. We want to get alternative views on radio and TV, but we also want to makes sure those alternative views are read, heard and seen online, which is becoming increasingly video and audio driven. Thanks to the stimulus package, we've established that broadband networks -- the Internet -- are critical, national infrastructure. We think that gives us an opening to look at what runs over that critical infrastructure." (emphasis supplied)

This is breathtaking. Of course it is breathtaking because they want to censor the Internet which has done famously without the aid of the likes of Henry Waxman but by their "logic" as well: because search engines do not direct the seeker to a left-wing websites, the government must regulate. Notoriously, liberals want not equality of opportunity but equality of results. Set forth in bold the object is wittingly or unwittingly admitted: they want those alternative views to be "read", "heard," and "seen" online. The arrogance is breathtaking.

The arrogance does not stop there. These liberals claim jurisdiction over the Internet because the physical infrastructure of the Internet is planned to be subsidized by porkulus. But porkulus and these provisions are stealth provisions in a stealth law. This goes beyond arrogance and becomes a matter of deceit and borders on the criminal. If I were a civil matter it would be called fraud.

Has anyone read lately the bill of particulars against George III in the Declaration of Independence?


8 posted on 02/18/2009 9:35:46 AM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

It is already unreal what this socialist Obama and his party have begun to engineer. The battle over free speach is well under way...


9 posted on 02/18/2009 9:44:55 AM PST by Made In The USA (Liberalism is a sign of stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

What he’s trying to do, I suspect, is to regulate shows like Rush and Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity who have their shows broadcast from their own web sites. This is one way conservative talk show hosts can get around the Censorship Doctrine.


11 posted on 02/18/2009 10:05:27 AM PST by murron (Proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

If the government can decide what’s “fair” in terms of political content on the radio or the internet, then what on Earth is the free speech clause of the First Amendment supposed to protect???!!!

I’m speechless. No pun intended.


13 posted on 02/18/2009 10:08:19 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy
"Thanks to the stimulus package, we've established that broadband networks -- the Internet -- are critical, national infrastructure. We think that gives us an opening to look at what runs over that critical infrastructure."

Evil. Just plain evil.

14 posted on 02/18/2009 10:23:22 AM PST by BenLurkin (Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

15 posted on 02/18/2009 10:40:24 AM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

The bigger deal they make out of this the better. This might wake up some people.


16 posted on 02/18/2009 10:54:28 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: atomic conspiracy

My bet is Congress will try to impose Internet censorship just like the Australians are doing ...under the guise of stopping kiddie porn. If fully enacted all Aussi ISPs would required to have a “filter” to prevent access to a government issued list of “objectionable” sites. All of this extra cost would of course be paid by Internet users in the form of new taxes on Internet access. All it would take to end access to Free Republic would be for the government to declare it a “hate” site.


18 posted on 02/18/2009 1:20:18 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson