[mlo]

None of these excerpted questions are controversial. Any scientific issue should cover evidence both for and against.

But evidence against evolution, whatever that may be, does not equate to creationism.

[GodGunsGuts]

So you’re saying that evidence of a young earth, an orchard of trees instead of a tree of life, no transitional fossils or missing links, evidence of a global flood, etc, etc, should not be placed in the creation science side of the ledger?

[Oztrich Boy]

None of these excerpted questions are controversial. Any scientific issue should cover evidence both for and against.

The Law of Contrarian Polling states: Given a choice of two positions, at least 10-20% of those polled will agree with either one of them, no matter how illogical it is.