[Durus]

I don't know that "irresponsible use of a firearm" exists in this situation and neither do you. You don't know what the backstop was, how close the closest neighbor was, the BAC of the shooter etc. Still you assume that he must be in the wrong. There is no report of anyone being hurt or any property damage to anyone (Else's) home so where is the irresponsible use?

If someone wants to shoot up their TV, as long as no one else is hurt, it's none of your business regardless if you agree with the action or not.

[antiRepublicrat]

If someone wants to shoot up their TV, as long as no one else is hurt, it's none of your business regardless if you agree with the action or not.

I think the action itself was pretty funny. But, no, I don't think a person should be able to discharge firearms willy-nilly in a crowded environment. The possibility innocent injury is just too high. It is my business if I'm only a thin wall away from where he's shooting.

We used to take our stuff out to the desert to shoot it up. It's fun, and much more responsible.