The state statute § 18.2-308.1:3 deals with that.
In fact, it reads: It shall be unlawful for any person...who was the subject of a temporary detention order pursuant to § 37.2-809 [I was] and subsequently agreed to voluntary admission pursuant to § 37.2-805 [I did not] to purchase, possess or transport a firearm....
The form here proves that I did not seek voluntary treatment.
And imagine the absurdity if you had uttered, "You are staking your case on your interpretation and belief that the use of the term "probable cause" somehow reduces the effectiveness or totality of the arrest warrant that places in you jail. It does not."
Absurd. Just because someone was arrested for a crime does not mean, de facto, that the person in question is subject to laws that only apply to those who are convicted of crimes.
Refrain from calling me 'son.' Ignorance isn't congenital. And neither is insanity.
And to answer your question, I attempted to purchase a firearm in October of 2008.
You were.
You answered under oath “no.”
You liked under oath.
You got caught.
Take your punishment like a man. Stop trying to crybaby your way out of this.... or stop proving beyond any doubt how right the original committing Magistrate was.
PS. You say, “Ignorance isn't congenital. And neither is insanity.” You are right. You apparently got this one all on your own, sport.