The legislation that empowers the question on the “yellow sheet”!
You aren’t serious about that question, are you?
No, it was rhetorical.
I was simply saying that justice declaring probable cause of mental illness and a justice adjudicating mental illness are separate things.
The purpose of the hearing on this page
http://picasaweb.google.com/faroukaliraqi/Purpose#5304763801776381618
was to determine if he was mentally ill, then the ninth point would take effect of him not being able to purchase guns. But the hearing did not find him to be mentally ill, quite the opposite, and the proof can be found on this page:
http://picasaweb.google.com/faroukaliraqi/ProofTwo#5304764734642585282
Which I linked to before. Since the court did not find him mentally ill and he was thus not involuntarily committed, the gun restriction never took place.
Now if the court at the hearing found him mentally ill and had him involuntarily committed, then I would agree with you that the ninth point on the hearing purposes page would take effect, but the court records show that he was not.