[research99]

Shelby’s argument isn’t the strongest one, as it relies on the presumption of what the original birth certificate MAY reveal.

The stronger arguments, are questions relating to the Indonesian adoption, apparent Indonesian passport use in 1981, and the “dual (Kenyan) citizenship” (which all have been admitted to be factual, and which contradict the “natural born” citizen requirement of the Constitution).

[3D-JOY]

Thank You!

This is so important that I am glad to read it over and over.

Some of the legal challenges have included these Indonesian and Passport travel questions too.

[Non-Sequitur]

The stronger arguments, are questions relating to the Indonesian adoption, apparent Indonesian passport use in 1981, and the “dual (Kenyan) citizenship” (which all have been admitted to be factual, and which contradict the “natural born” citizen requirement of the Constitution).

But part of the Donofrio 'natural born citizen' definition is the requirement that the president be born within the U.S. Shelby is just parroting what that theory states.