Posted on 02/22/2009 8:03:21 PM PST by Ancient Drive
To answer the question, no, we cannot. The House can for any reason whatsoever that might be considered a high crime or misdemeanor. The Senate would try him if that happened. It will not happen.
I have been thinking the same thing. I hope so. Doesn’t he have to do something illegal?
-
That all depends on if you are a DEM or Rep. If you’re a Dem then you can do anything you want. If you’re are Rep you can’t do anything without drawing severe criticism from the left!!! Then, you must go before a Congressional hearing to defend yourself from something you didn’t do in the first place!! All the while, the liberal MSM has already tried and sentenced you without even a shred of REAL evidence to prove your guilt. :)
Now, see how this works?!
Should we do or best? Of course. But I believe that the people are under a strong delusion.
Time for us to be bipartisan, and point out that Barama is screwing all of us.
We have 2 years
Hee Haw, Hee Haw.
Get out your donkey-whackers and limber ‘em up.
I don’t think any prez should be impeached for anything that comes down to a matter of opinion.
The quick answer is yes the House could do it if they wanted to and the Senate could impeach him. Of course it takes 50% +1 of the House to impeach the President. Do you see any chance in h*ll that the House would do that? I don’t.
Keep chipping away. Never surrender.
I hear dissent in the ranks at DU already
Now that is funny you must have read about my accident that left me blind in one Eye. how nice of you Sad really Good bye now
Hehehehehe...no, thank goodness...just had to be schooled on what is what...malfeasance...misfeasance and the difference between the two...
I do know, and I ma not a lawyer, misfeasance is knowing what must be done yet you failed to do it and malfeasance is being unable to do what should have been done...purely layman's terms here...sorry. I am sure legal minds will correct me or elaborate.
Even if that opinion is that the constitution is fundamentally flawed?
No Sir. Our system was set up to prevent the tyrants AND the roar of the masses(Mob rule).
This guy is bolting out of the gate and rowling up the hoi paloi. I say Whoooaaa! Where are the checks and balances?
Socialism? Obama is a Marxist/Communist idealist. Socialism requires a healthy, functioning capitalist system to feed off of in order to steal funds via taxes on profits and the wages of those working for those businesses to fund government run social programs.
Marxism is when the government runs everything, there is no privately run business to speak of, and then uses the funds generated by government run business and factories and what ever it can make off those cheap exports to fund social programs, something like the soviet union was/is.
So no, Obama isn't running the economy into the ground for "socialism" to run into your veins, That would destroy socialism as well.
He's destroying private enterprise and industry as well as private banking system so he can take over everything, turning it into government run industries and a government run banking system, as well as controlling all the social needs of the citizenry, which of course will become something like what the USSR had/still has to some extent.
check and balances only applies to white guys. ;)
I do hope to agree and disagree with you on many things in the future. I acknowledge your civil ending tonight and appreciate it.
That’s Racist!
What????
Yes, you is.
Psst! they are all dead now. As far as "African Americans" effected by this today, there are none.
In fact 99% can't even trace their ancestry beyond immediate family (mother), or one generation at the most.
That’s right, cracker. Payback’s are a b1tch! And, oh boy, are you gonna pay. 40 acres and a mule, remember?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.