To: GodGunsGuts
Yes, let me see if I can simplify this AMAZING revelation.
If there is debate, then it is not Science.
However, what is not debatable is Science.
Genesis is not debatable.
Genesis is Science.
I respectfully think not.
To: acliffhang3r
The article says nothing of the sort. It's saying that the general/macro theory of evolution is unobservable and unrepeatable, and therefore does not fall under the definition of empirical science. As such, the macro theory of evolution is story telling based on historical inferences that are based on materialistic ASSUMPTIONS.
To: acliffhang3r
Yes, let me see if I can simplify this AMAZING revelation. No need: "In other words, a legitimate scientific theory (a hypothesis or idea) must be observable in real time and must be testable, yielding reproducible results." It is clear enough except to the blind and as they say, "There is none so blind as those who refuse to see".
59 posted on
02/23/2009 3:31:04 AM PST by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: acliffhang3r
“If there is debate, then it is not Science.”
Great analysis......Not!
87 posted on
02/23/2009 5:54:41 AM PST by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: acliffhang3r
If it can not be tested and observed and reproduced it is a THEORY. If it is a THEORY it is NOT a FACT. It is only an Idea that someone invented. It becomes a SCIENTIFIC FACT once it has been Tested, Observed and Reproduced. It doesn't matter how much you BELIEVE in the THEORY, it is still ONLY a THEORY.
181 posted on
02/23/2009 11:01:30 AM PST by
Lyantana
(A Southern View)
To: acliffhang3r; GodGunsGuts
Yes, let me see if I can simplify this AMAZING revelation. If there is debate, then it is not Science. However, what is not debatable is Science. Genesis is not debatable. Genesis is Science.
I respectfully think not.
This sounds like standard fair from the cult of evolution.
You can tell that evolution is neither theory or science because anytime it's criticized, like a swarm of army ants the cultists attack any and all criticisms, including so-called peer review as "religion" or "attacks on science".
What's equally fascinating is the cultists don't seem to understand this is a floundering and failing tactic and harming the theory, or what's left of it, more than any actual peer review ever could.
543 posted on
02/27/2009 2:11:47 PM PST by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson