Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Recent Human Variation Is Not Evolution (evidence points to recent creation)
ICR ^ | February 23, 2009 | Brian Thomas, M.S.

Posted on 02/23/2009 10:05:02 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: ColdWater
Isn't that pretty much the YEC position? He pushed a button, created man and closed his eyes?

YEC?

41 posted on 02/23/2009 10:47:52 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Why not? It may all be part of God's plan. It is presumptious for you to declare that you know God's plan.

Because God told us His plan. And it doesn't include evolution.

42 posted on 02/23/2009 10:48:45 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Contradictory. Direction dictates plan, which negates chance.

God's plan. Not contradictory.

43 posted on 02/23/2009 10:48:54 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
How dare you put limits on God's ability.

God could fill this world with little animated gingerbread men who all jump into your mouth. But He didn't. Is that "putting limits" on God's ability?

44 posted on 02/23/2009 10:50:00 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

YEC = Young Earth Creationist


45 posted on 02/23/2009 10:50:40 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
God could fill this world with little animated gingerbread men who all jump into your mouth. But He didn't. Is that "putting limits" on God's ability?

?

46 posted on 02/23/2009 10:51:23 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ender Wiggin

“There is indeed a lot Darwin got wrong about human DNA.”

Darwin never said the slightest thing wrong about DNA, because it was not even discovered until long after his death.

My never-humble opinion: the creationist line on this is completely looney.


47 posted on 02/23/2009 10:51:35 AM PST by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Why not? It may all be part of God's plan. It is presumptious for you to declare that you know God's plan.

1st question: Why not? because an accident cannot be redeemed. You must first have belonged and then lost in order to need a redeemer.

2nd question: I do know God's plan. It is well documented in the Bible, specifically the New Testament. Read it, you will enjoy it. God's plan involves a personal relationship with you, His creation!

48 posted on 02/23/2009 10:51:54 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
God could fill this world with little animated gingerbread men who all jump into your mouth. But He didn't. Is that "putting limits" on God's ability?

How do you know he didn't? Are you the one that call's the shots for God?

49 posted on 02/23/2009 10:52:03 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
?

You seem to be under the impression that when someone says that God didn't do something that would be theoretically possible for Him to do, that this is somehow "putting limits on God's abilities". I would question that conclusion as faulty reasoning.

50 posted on 02/23/2009 10:52:44 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
1st question: Why not? because an accident cannot be redeemed. You must first have belonged and then lost in order to need a redeemer.

Are you saying that man created by God through evolution is an accident?

51 posted on 02/23/2009 10:53:11 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
God's plan. Not contradictory.

Please point out in any of the sacred writings, Old and/or New Testament, where God's plan involved evolution. G'hed.

52 posted on 02/23/2009 10:53:25 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater

Not me. I’m just noting that members of the anti-science crowd are rather uniform in claiming super powers. All of them, from weather girls to colonic irrigators, have mental capacities far beyond that of mere mortals.


53 posted on 02/23/2009 10:53:38 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
How do you know he didn't?

Because I don't see any little animated gingerbread men running around, anywhere, at any time. Unless you are one VERY fat man.

54 posted on 02/23/2009 10:54:12 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
You seem to be under the impression that when someone says that God didn't do something that would be theoretically possible for Him to do, that this is somehow "putting limits on God's abilities". I would question that conclusion as faulty reasoning.

I would say that your conclusion of what impression I am under is a conclusion of faulty reasoning.

55 posted on 02/23/2009 10:55:48 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
I would say that your conclusion of what impression I am under is a conclusion of faulty reasoning.

Sure. *yawn*

56 posted on 02/23/2009 10:56:39 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

You don’t believe that both direction and chance are under God’s control?


57 posted on 02/23/2009 10:56:50 AM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Because I don't see any little animated gingerbread men running around, anywhere, at any time.

Oh. In order for you to believe that God has done something, you have to see it with your own eyes. I think that I understand that perfectly, NOT!

58 posted on 02/23/2009 10:57:38 AM PST by ColdWater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Are you saying that man created by God through evolution is an accident?

Now who is making a Strawman?

God did not create man through evolution. Evolution requires random mutation and chance. God does nothing through chance. I thought I had covered this.

John 1:3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

59 posted on 02/23/2009 10:57:59 AM PST by rjsimmon (1-20-13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ColdWater
Oh. In order for you to believe that God has done something, you have to see it with your own eyes. I think that I understand that perfectly, NOT!

You really aren't that smart, are you?

60 posted on 02/23/2009 10:59:30 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson