Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Cool On Climate Change As Economic Pressures Escalate
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY ^ | 2/23/2009 | SEAN HIGGINS

Posted on 02/23/2009 6:51:19 PM PST by Plutarch

To environmentalists, there is no more urgent question than addressing global climate change. The new Democrat-led Congress has vowed to pass major cap-and-trade legislation in response.

Later this year. Maybe.

While President Obama said in Canada last week that climate change remains a priority, Congress appears in no hurry to act.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., last week promised a bill "hopefully" by late summer. The House is unlikely to even attempt to pass a major bill until December at the earliest, according to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Crafting a bill is proving tricky. The Democrats now have a larger majority, but many of the newer lawmakers hail from Midwestern and Southern states where emissions cuts could hurt businesses.

Balancing Act

Brand-new lawmakers like Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio, say any bill must be balanced and slowly phase in emissions controls.

"We must be aggressive enough to safeguard the environment, but not so overzealous that businesses cannot participate," said Fudge, who serves on the House Science and Technology Committee.

Cap-and-trade would require businesses to buy permits to release carbon emission as a way of reducing CO2 emissions overall. For states that use a lot of coal-fired electricity, that could mean new expenses for business and new costs for consumers.

It's a complex issue, says Ohio freshman Democrat Steve Driehaus, especially for his home state, which has a lot of high-sulfur coal.

"I am supportive of strong environmental policies, but at the same time understanding of the reality of the cost of coal and the abundance of coal. The challenge we face in Congress is balancing those interests," Driehaus said.

For the House speaker to build a consensus, there has to be a lot of listening on both sides, he says. Pelosi is "wise to be prudent" in how she approaches it...

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Interesting...reality intrudes upon the Democrats, who who have acted like teenagers having a wild party while the parents are away, but now learn that the parents are about to return. They don't want to take any more blame for the Dow tanking, and fear for a reprise of 1994 in 2010.
1 posted on 02/23/2009 6:51:19 PM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Gore is shitting bricks or ice cubes.


2 posted on 02/23/2009 6:53:42 PM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

during the summer O will go for Cap N Trade


3 posted on 02/23/2009 6:54:37 PM PST by GeronL (Hey, won't you be my Face Book friend??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
I'm confused. I thought green policies were actually good for the economy.

Bueller...Bueller...

4 posted on 02/23/2009 6:59:00 PM PST by lawnguy (The function of wisdom is to discriminate between good and evil-Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

It won’t in be one noticable piece of legislation. It’ll be bunches of little things tucked quietly into other appropriation bills in the dark of night, hush-hush Executive Orders, and the EPA upping the ante by lowering the tolerable levels of just about everything.


5 posted on 02/23/2009 7:06:13 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
Cap-and-trade would require businesses to buy permits to release carbon emission as a way of reducing CO2 emissions overall. For states that use a lot of coal-fired electricity, that could mean new expenses for business and new costs for consumers.

Just build nukes...what, that doesn't allow the RATs to tax us up the butt? Never mind, cap & trade is the solution.

6 posted on 02/23/2009 7:15:10 PM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

“I believe we have to because we see that as a source of revenue,”

Just another Tax with a different name


7 posted on 02/23/2009 7:21:13 PM PST by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

8 posted on 02/23/2009 7:27:41 PM PST by steelyourfaith (A Nation of Cowards (???) ... A Cabinet of Morons !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson