Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The I’s Have It (Obama confuses "me" and "I")
New York Times ^ | February 23, 2009 | Patricia T O'Conner and Stewart Kellerman

Posted on 02/24/2009 10:38:52 AM PST by reaganaut1

When President Obama speaks before Congress and the nation tonight, he will be facing some of his toughest critics.

Grammar junkies.

Since his election, the president has been roundly criticized by bloggers for using “I” instead of “me” in phrases like “a very personal decision for Michelle and I” or “the main disagreement with John and I” or “graciously invited Michelle and I.”

The rule here, according to conventional wisdom, is that we use “I” as a subject and “me” as an object, whether the pronoun appears by itself or in a twosome. Thus every “I” in those quotes ought to be a “me.”

So should the president go stand in a corner of the Oval Office (if he can find one) and contemplate the error of his ways? Not so fast.

For centuries, it was perfectly acceptable to use either “I” or “me” as the object of a verb or preposition, especially after “and.” Literature is full of examples. Here’s Shakespeare, in “The Merchant of Venice”: “All debts are cleared between you and I.” And here’s Lord Byron, complaining to his half-sister about the English town of Southwell, “which, between you and I, I wish was swallowed up by an earthquake, provided my eloquent mother was not in it.”

It wasn’t until the mid-1800s that language mavens began kvetching about “I” and “me.” The first kvetch cited in Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage came from a commencement address in 1846. In 1869, Richard Meade Bache included it in his book “Vulgarisms and Other Errors of Speech.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; bhospeech; dunce; gaffemachine; grammar; kantspel; macacamoment; obama; obamagaffes; potatoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: al baby

“...the reek of sulphur is still here.” (to paraphrase Ugh-ho Chavez)


21 posted on 02/24/2009 10:48:33 AM PST by null and void (We are now in day 35 of our national holiday from reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BookmanTheJanitor

I think it’s called “the narcissist’s dilemma”.

BOTH of those words are SOOOOOOO appealing to him, he simply MUST use them interchangeably.


22 posted on 02/24/2009 10:48:55 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
But !!

I Won !! So I can say anything I want to !!

23 posted on 02/24/2009 10:49:34 AM PST by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I know I’M shocked and surprised by this development!

;^)


24 posted on 02/24/2009 10:49:47 AM PST by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WayneS
Wow. The Obamessiah be older than I thought him was.

Being the messiah, I'm surprised Obama does not speak in Aramaic.

25 posted on 02/24/2009 10:49:49 AM PST by 6SJ7 (Atlas Shrugged Mode: ON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I remember when he said “wreck havoc” instead of “wreak havoc” during the campaign.

Not a word from the MSM on this.

26 posted on 02/24/2009 10:50:07 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; Constitution Day

Proper declension of pronouns is what sets us apart from the savages. That, and knowing our homophones, of course. And flush toilets.


27 posted on 02/24/2009 10:50:18 AM PST by Tax-chick ("Global leadership means never having to say you're sorry." ~IBD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
So apparently, Obama is soooo smart that he speaks English as it was originally intended, and not according to the distortions of the last 200 years.

LOL! Those "olde English" classes must be listed on his transcript we're not allowed to see. ;)

Seriously, though, this is one of my pet peeves. That, and mixing up "there", "they're" and "their". Oh, and "lose" and "loose".

28 posted on 02/24/2009 10:50:50 AM PST by proud American in Canada ("We can, and we will prevail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
How long before IT starts using the royal WE?
29 posted on 02/24/2009 10:51:10 AM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ((B.?) Hussein (Obama?Soetoro?Dunhem?), change America will die for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Thanks for posting the article.

The author qoutes some of obama’s misspeaks, then to justify them, qoutes two sentences where the word ‘between’ is specifically used.

The usual way to tell if you should use “me” or “I”, is to leave out the other ‘subject’, and say the sentence.

i.e. “a very personal decision for (Michelle and) I”

“the main disagreement with (John or) I”

“graciously invited (Michelle and) I.”

One must remember that Obama has lived in environments where a different ‘language’ or ‘dialect’ is used.

One that has no ‘rules’, but instead has ‘fads’.


30 posted on 02/24/2009 10:52:00 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Where’s the NYT explanation of why Ottawa really should be pronounced “Iowa” a la O-Idiot?


31 posted on 02/24/2009 10:52:07 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I wonder if “I” and “Me” are used correctly in his books?

Of course they are. Bill Ayers knows how to write.

32 posted on 02/24/2009 10:52:11 AM PST by xjcsa (And these three remain: change, hope and government. But the greatest of these is government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I am sure he would get it right in his mother tongue, Arabic.


33 posted on 02/24/2009 10:53:27 AM PST by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
You'd think a Columbia and Harvard educated Messiah could get this right.
34 posted on 02/24/2009 10:56:37 AM PST by colorado tanker ("I just LOVE clinging to my guns and my religion!!!!" - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

So the President was born in the 17th century?

Makes as much sense as anything else he’s said.


35 posted on 02/24/2009 10:57:17 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
That's as bad as Eric Holder and his reference to “a effnik metting pot”.

I barely heard the rest of his self-pitying, chip-on-his-shoulder diatribe, because I was laughing so hard from that, I almost missed his “nation of cowards” comment.

If you only read his comments in the adoring press, you'd never know how he really said it. But, if you listen to his actual comment, you get to hear what how marginally literate he truly is.

The second most powerful C-Student in America.

36 posted on 02/24/2009 10:57:39 AM PST by conservativeharleyguy (Democrats: Over 60 million fooled daily!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
He also occasionally misuses indefinite articles "a" and "an", for example:

'It was a unintentional omission.'

This is especially likely to happen if he inserts a mellifluous "uh" between the "a" and "unintentional".

But GWB is the uneducated moron...


37 posted on 02/24/2009 10:58:01 AM PST by DJ Frisat (I don't run in the Special Olympics and I don't try to reason with liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

There is a flower shop in the downtown area where I live.

For 20 years, it has had “bokays” painted on the window.

I guess they were appealing to their audience.

Had they had “bouqet” painted on there, no one would have understood what it was they were selling.


38 posted on 02/24/2009 10:58:37 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

My husband and I are worried that Obama will ruin you and me.


39 posted on 02/24/2009 10:59:49 AM PST by fullchroma (I want my country back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

I ain’t falling for this. I don’t care about his grammar, I care about his Marxism. They wish they could get us to fight about his grammar.


40 posted on 02/24/2009 10:59:50 AM PST by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson